User talk:جواد/Archive1

I confirm that I want to create an account in toolserver. And Javadyou is my username in jira. Javadyou (talk) 19:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

The two categories are virtually the same, why does the fa wiki have 2 virtually identical categories? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * no,fa:رده:روستاهای شهرستان مشهد in english can be category:villages in mashhad county.now Mashhad is in Category:Populated places in Mashhad County, and mashhad is a city and not a روستا (village).Regards جواد (talk) 19:24, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, but the fa categories need some clean up, as there are some cities in the villages categories and some of the populated places categories are missing articles that are only in the villages category. somewhat confusing. I'll see what can be done on the en wiki. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Carlossuarez, in fa.wiki, we have a bot , that give category to articles based on en.wiki,and as soon as , we clean up these categories جواد (talk) 20:46, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email! If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia). Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
 * 2) Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code.  Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
 * 3) Create your account by entering the requested information.  (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
 * 4) You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID.  (The account is now active for 1 year).
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
 * Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
 * Show off your Questia access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

HighBeam
Hey, sorry to be the bearer of bad news... Though your application was perfect and your account fully approved, we ran out of access codes 7 short of the total who signed up in round 6. I've gone ahead and moved you to the top of the list for round 7. If and as soon as we are given access to more accounts, you will be first to receive it. If you need help accessing sources, WikiProject Resource Exchange is a great place to go, or for HighBeam specifically, you might try asking one of the other 1000 editors who have HighBeam access this year. Again, I'm sorry, and I'll keep pushing for more access to these valuable resources. Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 18:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Danish Defence IT Agency
Hello جواد, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Danish Defence IT Agency, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Eastmain, I tag this revision of this page for speedy deletion, that is an empty article.see it in edit state without any data except infobox ! Javad  |Talk  (16 Farvardin 1392) 10:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Though I can't (and won't) speak on User:Eastmain's behalf, being the creator of that article, I'd like to note (as I also did on Talk:Danish Defence IT Agency) that only allowing something like 15 minutes for a new article, which is even marked in the history as being in progress, seems a bit overly trigger-happy to me. As much as cleanup of article-space is an admirable activity, I would like to encourage you to approach the issue a bit more holistic, and not just look at the content of that specific version. In kind regards, --Heb (talk) 06:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok,Excuse me for my fast reaction about it :) Best Regards Javad  |Talk  (22 Farvardin 1392) 06:51, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

تعجب!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
با سلام نمی دانم با چه لحنی باید صحبت کنم من در حال حاضر در خطرم و برای یاد آوری یا تعمد برچسب پاک شدن زده اید. در عوض تکمیلش کنید لطفا!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peyman Ghasemi (talk • contribs) 07:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Here is English wikipedia, please write in english Javad  |Talk  (26 Farvardin 1392) 07:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New newsletter for Notifications
Hello

You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Amin Aminem for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amin Aminem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amin Aminem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  22:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)