User talk:رشاد

Welcome!
Hello, ADMIRAL12, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Google Developer Groups, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Google Developer Groups


A tag has been placed on Google Developer Groups requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Sources for Queen of Sheba
I can’t see where the Guardian article mentions Yemeni influence. I don’t think Tomppert is a reliable source here, but what does he actually say? Doug Weller talk 20:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Doug Weller. the Guardian article talks about Yemen and the relationship of the Queen of Sheba to Sheba. It also talks about "Marib, where one of her temples, Mahram Bilqis, has been unearthed." and "The Yemeni think of these whirlwinds as djinns or genies, and believe that Sheba was born from one of them. Bilqis means a being half-human and half-spirit". The book touched on the fact that the Queen of Sheba was the first democracy among the ancient civilizations, and that by seeking advice she was the reason for the prosperity of Yemen in the past.
 * Another article posted in the Harvard Divinity Bulletin stated: Folktales and apocryphal accounts from the Jewish rabbinic tradition, the Coptic Christian tradition in the Ethiopian book Glory of Kings (Kebra Nagast), and the Arab Yemeni tradition have elaborated on the scriptural tales to give Sheba a jinni mother, goat or donkey hooves, and hairy legs. In the Bible, hair is associated with physical and intellectual strength, as in the story of Samson: “If my head were shaved, my strength would leave me, and I would become as weak as any other man” (Judges 16:17). But male tellers of traditional tales have associated women’s hairy legs with the devil or with lesbianism to limit women’s access to political power.
 * Should I add the Harvard Divinity Bulletin article instead of the book? Please advice. ADMIRAL12 (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Use just the Harvard article I think. Doug Weller  talk 21:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay. I've fixed that, can you please check? ADMIRAL12 (talk) 21:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok I guess but it just occurred to me (and sorry to be so slow in replying) that as the lead is meant to summarise the article itself and generally shouldn't have information in the lead not in the article except for a few things, that someone might revert because of that. But I'm leaving it as it is, just added an "and". Doug Weller  talk 14:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)