User talk:صحاسبت

Salwa Idrissi Akhannouch
Dear, Thank you for your your improvement. You have mentioned the article as a advertising article. Can you kindly let me know which sentence or which word is advertisement? Its 4 days that I red Wikipedia's terms and policies about context writing and I don't know which section of article is advertising. I appreciate your help in advance. Best regards.صحاسبت (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting in touch. "historic agreement", "unique architectural concept" - that reads like a press release, not an encyclopedia article. Just let the facts should speak for themselves. Adjectives like "historic" and "unique" rarely add anything (and need citations to back them up). I've written articles about people I admire without using words like "heroic" or "brave". The way they lived, and died, speaks for itself. Happy editing! Narky Blert (talk) 21:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you so much! You're right, I haven't paid attention to this point. So after removing these adjectives and promotional words, Can I remove the tag? Best regards.صحاسبت (talk) 21:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Of course! A tag just means that an editor thinks they've seen a problem. If any other editor thinks they've resolved it, they're fully entitled to remove the tag. Best, Narky Blert (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Cielo WiGle moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Cielo WiGle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chirota (talk) 20:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm qualified for creating article in main space, not in draft space. article is completely ready and I have added all the sources. hence, the raticle shoube be approved or deleted, not moving to draft. It will be checked out by a reviewer. please wait. Regards.صحاسبت (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Dear, I created my first article in Wikipedia, before reviewing, another user moved it to draft space. As I mentioned I'm a qualified user to create articles in main space and it was ready and I added all the sources. now, in history of page I saw that user is creator of article. can you help me in this regard? Thanks.صحاسبت (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not a new article reviewer. The best person to ask is (who moved your article to draftspace), on their talkpage. If you ask nicely, they should be able to explain what the problems are, and how you might be able to overcome them. Just about every editor wants to get new articles into Wikipedia not to keep them out - provided they're up to standard. I haven't looked in any detail, but at first sight it looks as if too many (or even all) of the citations might be closely associated with Cielo WiGle. What you need are independent in-depth citations (see WP:RS, and also WP:CORPDEPTH).
 * In the meantime, I've fixed a few ambiguous links in the draft.
 * Don't get discouraged! Writing your first article and getting it accepted is the most difficult thing you will ever do on Wikipedia. I lost several in my early days, before I knew at least some of the rules. Best, Narky Blert (talk) 21:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Mother tongue
I could be wrong, but I am guessing from your username and User Page that your mother tongue may be Urdu. If it is, do you have an account in, and edit in, Urdu Wikipedia? Because, from all I've seen, it's in terrible shape - 165,380 articles, 232 active users, 11 admins (compare enwiki - 6,397,745, 125,894, 1,077, respectively). I know which one needs more attention, especially from people who know the language! English Wikipedia is not the be-all and end-all.

With your English language skills, you might also be able to help at Translators available. Best wishes, Narky Blert (talk) 22:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * First of all, thank you for your attention. That′s right my native language is Urdu. as I remember in 2017 or 2016 I created an article about a village around Lahore. Before writing the article I checked out multiple articles about other village and it was completely written like others. only due to being a new account registered, they removed the article and the reason was ″Dose not meet Wikipedia's guidelines″. The article be created by another user. I decided to left the Urdu Wikipedia forever and forgot my accounts info. But I'm going to start translating articles from English Wikipedia to Urdu on January 2022. I created an article which was ready for main space but another user moved it to draft, then I recreated the article and he nominated the article for deletion. After closing the discussion, he named me in a list that I'm a Sockpuppet! after closing the discussion about being Sockpuppet, he tagged the article as non-notable article! if the discussion was about the notability of subject and it was closed why he tagged the article again? why he removed articles several links? I wrote Two of the company's products was named as the "7 Best Smart AC Controllers For Ductless Fans" by Heavy., he removed the source of this sentence! I'm sure if I create a new article he will bother me instead of helping me! What should I do?صحاسبت (talk) 15:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Was this in English Wikipedia? If it was, I suggest you ask this question at WP:TEAHOUSE - you'll get a wider range of answers there. Narky Blert (talk) 15:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm talking about Cielo WiGle. Actually I think others will support Chiro725, because he is oldest user than me. Anyway...صحاسبت (talk) 15:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Cielo WiGle comfortably survived Articles for deletion/Cielo WiGle, so there's no cause for alarm. Contributors to that discussion found some additional sources which you might be able to use. Narky Blert (talk) 16:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned, he nominated the article for deletion. After closing the discussion, he named me in a list that I'm a Sockpuppet! after closing the discussion about being Sockpuppet, he tagged Cielo WiGle as non-notable article! if the discussion was about the notability of subject and it was closed why he tagged the article again? why he removed articles several links? I wrote Two of the company's products was named as the "7 Best Smart AC Controllers For Ductless Fans" by Heavy., he removed the source of this sentence!صحاسبت (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * You also comfortably survived at Sockpuppet investigations/صدیق صبري/Archive. Girth Summit, who conducted the investigation, is a very experienced admin. Narky Blert (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * yes I told you all what happened, after all of these process he tagged the article as a non-ntable and removed the several sources of Cielo WiGle!صحاسبت (talk) 16:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The article should be safe for now. Add the citations mentioned in the AFD discussion, and move on to something less frustrating! Narky Blert (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I did that! He removed the citations and the tagged the article. please kindly check it out.صحاسبت (talk) 16:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Don't force it! The article has plenty of citations. Another experienced editor, a WP:DYK reviewer, once told me she didn't like to see more than three citations to support any given fact; more than that is WP:OVERKILL. (I'm not that keen on the Heavy citation, though I've seen worse.) Once an article is in mainspace, it effectively belongs to everyone, and anyone can improve it, and may well do so.

(Cracking the Cryptic survived a determined attack at Articles for deletion/Cracking the Cryptic. The nominating editor deleted everything they saw as trivia. I didn't try to add any of it back; except for two unquestionably WP:Reliable sources. Nevertheless, since the closure of that AFD other editors have independently restored it to much the same state as when I posted it (and have added some more citations).

Anyway - I've deleted the notability tag, with a reasoned WP:ES. Narky Blert (talk) 17:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Cielo WiGle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cielo WiGle, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Cielo WiGle (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)