User talk:پخش مطلب

Invite to RfC (Request for Comment) on Reagan article about Iran-Contra
Hi,

You're invited to an RfC on the question of, "Within the section on the Iran-Contra affair, should we include the aspect of drug trafficking on the part of some Nicaraguan Contras?"

Talk:Ronald_Reagan

Thanks,

FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 15:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahdi Falahati
Hello پخش مطلب,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mahdi Falahati for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- The9Man  ( Talk ) 07:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Politicsfan4. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Politicsfan4 (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello Politicsfan4. Which contributions do you mean?پخش مطلب (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * this edit made no sense to be. Is there an explanation? -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello.Thank you for contacting me. As you know, the term was used by Arnold Schwarzenegger to characterize opponents in the California Legislature.This article is related to Arnold Schwarzenegger. I am subject to your discretion .You can edit as you see fit.پخش مطلب (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward M. Flynn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Kelly. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikis as sources
Hi. Wikis are user-generated, making them unreliable sources. The same applies to IMDB, it's not a reliable source. Second.wiki is just a machine translation directly from Wikipedia. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

"Dr." as honorific
Hi, I've removed the claim of "Dr." as an honorific, as it appears that a) when a major office holder also holds academic titles, it is unusual to refer to them by their academic credentials, as opposed to the titles that come ex officio in the literature, and b) per MOS:CREDENTIAL, it seems to me that unless the subject is widely known by a pseudonym or stage name, the use of the title should be avoided. Best, BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with BrxBrx ) 01:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Alexander Djaparidze. Thank you.

See WP:COI in case it might apply.

You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. --Hipal (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Aaron Mendelsohn moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Aaron Mendelsohn, is not suitable as written to remain published. While he appears to meet notability criteria, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, it is almost entirely sourced by primary sources, which don't go to notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edward M. Flynn


The article Edward M. Flynn has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. The sources in the article are self-published, not significant coverage, based on interviews, or in the case of the Boston Globe source, not independent because it's based on a 'handout' (the word used in the article)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Novem Linguae (talk) 09:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Edward M. Flynn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward M. Flynn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edward M. Flynn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Novem Linguae (talk) 10:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Admin notice board
I wrote on admin notice board about how you keep deleting honorific prefix.Administrators' noticeboard bi (talk) 17:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Ike Hajinazarian moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ike Hajinazarian, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aaron Mendelsohn
Hello, پخش مطلب. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aaron Mendelsohn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aaron Mendelsohn


Hello, پخش مطلب. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aaron Mendelsohn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 19:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ike Hajinazarian
Hello, پخش مطلب. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ike Hajinazarian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Johnson (Alaska politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Johnson (Alaska politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Johnson (Alaska politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Laureus Sport for Good Award
Template:Laureus Sport for Good Award has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)