User talk:टीम निकी मिनाज

Welcome!
Hello, टीम निकी मिनाज, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

username...
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "टीम निकी मिनाज", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. As your name translates to "Team Nicki Minaj" this implies use by multiple people. Please act accordingly. Lectonar (talk) 08:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

American Renaissance (magazine)
I reverted your recent edits to African Americans. I don't know what you were thinking, but American Renaissance is never a reliable source. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 05:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, I'm Davey2010. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Toronto has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Toronto. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Davey 2010 Talk 00:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I would strongly suggest you go to the talkpage and explain why you believe your wording is better than the one you're replacing, Thanks – Davey 2010 Talk 00:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

African Americans
Please stop adding material to the article that fails verification, meaning the source doesn't support what you write. Please read WP:No original research, especially the section titled "Using sources", which says (in part):
 * Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material out of context. In short,.

Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It also appears that this isn't the only article you're edit warring on. If you continue this behavior after your block expires then your next block will be of a longer duration. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 16:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Toronto. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Persistent edits to the Drake article
Please find that your persistent edits to the Drake article are against Wikipedia edit policy, as you are consistently choosing to revert to your revision of the article, without preserving the value that other editors have added to the article in itself. Please find that this is detrimental to the article, and can make you eligible for being blocked from editing without further warning. – Psychopathic Assassin Talk 14:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring
Just to let you know I've withdrawn my report because not all diffs listed where problematic and your edits had gone beyond 27th which conveniently Twinkle didn't pick up on,

Infuture instead of readding the content I would strongly suggest you go to the talkpage and discuss it first, If you don't you could be blocked,

Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Drake (musician). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed  17:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

August 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Drake (musician), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dane2007 (talk) 05:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

American Renaissance
Still trying to use American Renaissance as a source? Try it again and I'll ask for you to be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 11:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

One more thing...
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on African Americans. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 11:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that you are part of a group that represents a company or individual. Your edits are also persistently disruptive (edit warring) and it appeaqrs that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)