User talk:भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर

== Welcome! ==

Hello, भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 05:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Suneye1&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

July 2020
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

I've added changed [contracted] text. And gaven all government reliable sources. No added file. It's a edit about the statue and two portraits in the Indian Parliament. Please check it and help.भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk) 01:36, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

First of all such information about whether the statue of portrait is installed anywhere or not is irrelevant to the article. Second legacy can be shown through different ways and not just statues. So stop adding information on statues and where they are installed. It's totally futile. Thanks  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 01:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Additionally link to the photo is no equal to citations. So please stop adding photos and link to photos as some important information. Thanks  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 01:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

On 22 July 1956, a portrait of Bal Gangadhar Tilak is put in the Central Hall of Parliament House.

I was going to add this full sentence but you deleted my all edits and reliable sources. I think, the Parliament of India is one of the most important places in the world. Things in the Parliament like statues and portraits are notable too. I think, you should don't revert it. But finally as you wish. भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk) 02:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , [] Such discussions show that we can't really use photos as references and every statue or portrait in the parliament can not become a statement in the respective articles.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Non-free images
Please do not add non-free images to any article other than the specific article about the person, as you did at List of vice presidents of India, as this contravenes the laws governing the use of non-free images, so is a copyright infringement. To check the status of an image, click on the image and read the "licensing" section on the image's File page - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 08:25, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I won't add non-free images to any article. भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk) 11:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Quick note on Shahu of Kolhapur
Thanks for your edits to Shahu of Kolhapur. Here Special:Diff/973246699 you reverted my edits and made me realise of my mistake thanks and regards.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:QueerEcofeminist. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Okay, sorry for this word and thank you for the suggestion. भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk) 18:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Marathi people
Hello भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर, As I mentioned in the edit summary, we do have a separate page called List of Marathi people. There are already many images there. Let us keep the Marathi people page about common Marathi people, their history and their culture.Jonathansammy (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Quick note on B. R. Ambedkar
Thanks for your edits to B. R. Ambedkar. in Special:Diff/992507223 revision you reverted again, giving a misleading edit summary of a link, where no such decision is made on the content of your edit. So that page has nothing to do with the reverted edits here. You shouldn't revert other editors without a proper reason or consensus. Additionally using misleading edit summaries is really bad way to communicate. I have reverted your edits with bad summary. Please don't do it again. And possibly refrain from editing the same page for long, that will help you to see bigger picture. thanks. Queer Eco feminist [they/them/their] 17:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


 * User:Srijanx22 removed the edits of many users, including myself, without giving a proper reason and without general consensus. But you are ignoring it, and you are deliberately targeting me. Don't you think the wiki community's consensus is needed when removing text from B. R. Ambedkar article? I am making proper edits, please stop bothering me. And do not remove my edits and the text from the article without consensus. Your role should be neutral, fair, and in line with the wiki policy, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Thanks. भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk) 14:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , Your edits were removed before and there is no connection to your edit and that sock puppet investigation, in terms of consensus to restore it. So you should stop your disruptive edits now. As you have been warned before, don't make personal attacks on me. You are responsible for your edits and people will come and bother you if you make problematic edits. Wiki is not a personal blog or opinion space, where anyone can write anything, we all are bound by policies and some standards of writing. thanks and regards. Queer Eco feminist [they/them/their] 17:16, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , Your edits were removed before and there is no connection to your edit and that sock puppet investigation, in terms of consensus to restore it. So you should stop your disruptive edits now. As you have been warned before, don't make personal attacks on me. You are responsible for your edits and people will come and bother you if you make problematic edits. Wiki is not a personal blog or opinion space, where anyone can write anything, we all are bound by policies and some standards of writing. thanks and regards. Queer Eco feminist [they/them/their] 17:16, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Consider this to be yet another warning, that you must stop this WP:DE on Ambedkar. You don't have consensus for your large additions and edit warring won't change it. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 18:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * You can't remove the text/version per WP:BRD. I think your action is not neutral. So I need a common consent or admin's intervention in this case. The changes you have suggested I have already done in the article, which I have mentioned on the BR Ambedkar talk page. But you are still removing all the text/version over and over again. You cannot delete the text alone without wiki community consent. Wait for the administrators and wiki community to decide. भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk) 06:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  03:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * thanks for this information. I'll not revert it again.भारतभूषण प्रकाश नरंदेकर (talk) 08:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)