User talk:श्रीमान २००२/Archives/2015/November

Multi-Tree
Hi. FYI, Multitree is not a reliable source. (They are actually quite unreliable.) IMO the only time they should be used is when they quote a known scholar by name.

Re. Eastern Acipa language, they just cite Ethnologue for the population anyway, so it's better just to cite Ethnologue. — kwami (talk) 18:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * OK -- Ankit fromहि है (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Image copyvio
Please read this. Your museum image upload clearly does not meet all of the 10 criteria. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Also, please inspect your work. Creating articles is appreciated, but you are leaving plenty of cleanup for others. Also, please read WP:OVERLINK. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * then how can the photo be uploaded -- Ankit fromहि है (talk) 09:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Simples! If it doesn't meet all those criteria, it can't be used. David Biddulph (talk) 10:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Punctuation
And no space before a full stop. Please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, please, inspect and fix your work. You do not wish to make work for us, right? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

The aspect about which Anna has reminded you (again) is described at MOS:PUNCTSPACE. That is a matter of standard English, not peculiar to Wikipedia. You will find much more detail about punctuation, and Wikipedia's preferred style where relevant, at Manual of Style, and you ought to have a look through the whole of the Manual of Style. You can't be expected to remember all the details, but you need to know where to check when you are not sure. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gomti Chakra


A tag has been placed on Gomti Chakra, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello, and  , pls check out here

Your recent edits
Ankit, please, I urge you to pay attention to your work. This is really a mess. I know that you read and write English, and have been studying it in school for years. Please do not leave all this work for others. Part of the deal here at Wikipedia is that you must be a net positive. At the moment, I am not sure you are. You have cost many hours of keystrokes and reads at this page and others. What have you given in return? Probably work that could have been done by one of us in 20 minutes. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

You must know that jewellery is not spelled "Jwellery". You started a museum article and got the spelling of that word right and visited a museum website and went to a museum where you took photos of that museum. Then you uploaded images using the spelling "museam". Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Anna, give the kid some slack. I'm sure he's trying to do his best not to make mistakes but just happened to accidentally misspell those words. "What have you given in return? Probably work that could have been done by one of us in 20 minutes." We aren't supposed to push down our fellow editors, but help them. And what do you mean by "One Of Us". Who is us? You see, you yourself, have made errors. Would you like to be pushed down as well? FiendYT (talk) 00:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, FiendYT. I spend countless hours helping new editors and am very patient. But I am a bean counter here. 1. I look at what an editor has contributed, 2. what community resources have been spent on a new editor, 3. and what the potential contributions are likely to be. All three worry me, especially #3 because the trail of problems left for others to clean up continues regardless of multiple kind posts pointing it out. I will spend hours helping if there is the potential for the editor to become a net positive, even if he is not at the moment. #3 worries me because my requests for him to inspect his work have been completely ignored.


 * Ankit: You are very welcome here. Wikipedia wants your contributions and is grateful that you are volunteering your time. But please, please, again, please, inspect your edits. We are talking about simple spelling and punctuation mistakes that you would catch if you would just read what you have done. I will help you in any way I can, as I have said above. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I can understand your reasoning Anna. This kid is very much a rookie. He would be great to have for Adoption. I, myself, have just requested to the oversight community for one of his photos to be removed. Ankit, seems like what I used to be, when I first joined Wikipedia, which wasn't that long ago to be honest. I didn't care about anything people wrote on my talk page, and such. Eventually, I came to understand and reply. I hope Ankit does this himself. FiendYT (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * You are very kind, FiendYT. I appreciate that. All Wikipedia wants is for him to improve and not continue with the errors. I don't see an improvement. Wikipedia needs him to be a net positive, or at the very least, show that he is heading in that direction. Honestly, I don't like to say this, but if he persists without improvement, he may end up blocked per WP:CIR.


 * And you were not the same. This is your first edit. Here is his (approx.) 100th, his 300th, and his 370th.


 * Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * (And they were not in a string of edits where he read his work and fixed things. He walked away with them like that.) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Ankit seems to think he's doing something for Wikipedia, but honestly.. it's hurting people more than helping. If he comes up with an excuse such as I'm young, that doesn't work either, also putting into fact that I am 11 years old. Wikipedia isn't age based, it's maturity based. I think he just thinks conversations in his talk pages are just people nuisances, like spam for Email. There isn't anything to be done besides put up with him until he returns. Should we wait until approximately a week till he fixes his spelling and such or request for him to be blocked? FiendYT (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Forgive me for insulting you during the beginning statements! I didn't know you were an administrator! My sincerest apologies! I didn't think an administrator would reply to a regular person's comments like this. FiendYT (talk) 01:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * About Ankit, I don't want to be too extreme in any direction. I think we should avoid personal disparaging remarks about him. And this is nothing personal. This is about him being a net positive or negative now and in the future. If he persists, we keep trying to get him to be a net positive. If and when it seems hopeless, he may end up blocked. As it stands, I see my signature at 14 posts at this page. I've fixed up his articles.


 * About me, I'm nothing special and admins are nothing special. I have been trying to help him as just another editor. And you did not insult me. You were sticking up for him, a newcomer, and that is good. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * You are indeed kind Anna. Thank you. Now now... I'm just wondering.. Do you offer adoptions? FiendYT (talk) 08:41, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * FiendYT, I adopt puppies but never humans. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

TAFI talk

 * Hello :


 * You are invited to participate in this discussion at the TAFI talk page regarding improving the automation of project processes and management of the project. Your input is appreciated.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on

Talkback
Request to revisit the discussion. North America1000 14:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Unexplained removal of orphan tag
Would you please explain these edits in which you removed the orphan tag from the article Gomti Chakra? Have you read WP:Orphan? What links in Special:WhatLinksHere/Gomti Chakra do you believe justify the removal of the tag? --David Biddulph (talk) 12:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry ,I thought orphan tag means that the page links nowhere .-- Ankit fromहि है (talk) 03:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The message produced by the tag had crystal clear wikilinks to WP:Orphan and to Special:WhatLinksHere/Gomti Chakra and you appear to have ignored them and blindly edited.  Do you realise why experienced editors are questioning your competence? I see that you still haven't replied to Anna in the section  above. --David Biddulph (talk) 03:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Inspect your edit
Please inspect and fix this. If you are not sure how, please read any other article to see where references go and how to use punctuation. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Also, could you please reply to this post so I know you have actually read it? I am really start to question your competence. Please communicate with me. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delayed reply ,but this has been already fixed by a bot .-- Ankit fromहि है (talk) 03:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The bot has fixed your misplaced reference but not your faulty punctuation. You are continuing with faulty punctuation in today's edits.  You were advised very clearly in the section  above.  Are you deliberately ignoring the advice, or do you not understand English?  --David Biddulph (talk) 03:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I see that even after the above message, you have made a number of further edits this morning which blatantly ignore the advice which Anna gave you, and the advice at MOS:PUNCTSPACE. Would you please explain why, so that  can decide what action to take? --David Biddulph (talk) 04:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * If you do indeed have difficulty in understanding English, you ought to stick to editing a Wikipedia in your own language until you learn enough English to be able to edit constructively here. Good luck with that. --David Biddulph (talk) 05:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Basics
Please read this:


 * When I eat ,I watch TV.


 * When I eat, I watch TV. ✅


 * I eat pizza.I watch TV.


 * I eat pizza. I watch TV. ✅

It is easy. I know you can do it if you try.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Has Ankit replied to any of our concerns yet? If he hasn't, he might be ignoring these concerns. Do you think he might be blocked soon? FiendYT (talk) 02:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Not yet, but then again, he doesn't edit much either. Let's be patient. Although he leaves a trail of work to clean up, he does occasionally make constructive edits. This is not an emergency. Let's see how things go. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks,, I Want to tell that in India, we are not taught to type efficiently in schools.-- Ankit fromहि है (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I understand. Well, this can be time for you to develop a new skill and habit. Be careful how you type. Read what you have typed. Please try hard. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * OK !-- Ankit fromहि है (talk) 07:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Signature
Hi Ankit, I noticed that your Wikipedia signature uses  markup which awkwardly increases the space between three successive lines. See WP:SIGAPP - and note that its generally not appreciated. Best,  Jim  Car  ter  07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Is it OK now?-- Ankit  ( है?) 07:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, its fine. Thank you for understanding!  Jim Car  ter  10:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Good job!
You did it! Good job. And you put the reference directly after the full stop (period ".") too! Well done! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, can you tell me how (!) is used?-- Ankit  ( है?) 05:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Use ! the same way you use a period. But do not use it in articles. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

B. R. Ambedkar
What you're adding to the article makes no sense. Some of it I can fix myself, e.g., give it context and clean up the formatting and syntax, but I can't do anything without an actual reference. The reference you added doesn't have a URL (a link to the website source). Without that, I can't verify that what you say is supported. I'm reverting again. If you want me to help you, you'll have to respond here. I've put your Talk page on my watchlist and will do my best to respond when I see something.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, please see, , and  are also not having any link. -- Ankit   ( है?) 05:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Those refs aren't the same. You appeared to want to cite a website, not an offline publication. If you cite an offline publication, then you have to give a complete description of it, page number, etc., whatever is appropriate depending on the publication.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It is from a newspaper.-- Ankit  ( है?) 10:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for trying, but I've now found the article online here, and there's a more fundamental problem. What you're saying is unsupported by the newspaper. The Time says: "The government is likely to come out with a coin of Rs 125 to commemorate the birth anniversary of Bhim Rao Ambedkar." You can't say they've done something that they are simply considering doing. Nor is the fact they are considering it noteworthy. If they do it, then it would be noteworthy. As I read it, that wouldn't happen until April 14, 2016. I would appreciate it if you would self-revert. Although I think I would be justified in reverting the change, I'm uncomfortable doing so after the two of us have been going back and forth in the last couple of days. , you seem to be more familiar with Ankit hindustan than I; perhaps you could lend your deft talents at resolving this? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Bbb23 explains it just fine, Ankit. Please keep things simple. Add facts to articles written in your own words based on reliable sources. That is a basic thing we do here and you must be able to get that right. This is not a language issue. It is an intelligence issue. You are intelligent so you can do it. Oh, and blogspot is not a good source. Please read WP:RS. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Done-- Ankit  ( है?) 08:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Done-- Ankit  ( है?) 08:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I am seeing you on Dr. Ambedkar's page since few days, other editors are guiding you regarding that issue, we can write it once coin is finalized. Anyway, you seem to be interested in Jharkhand related topics, that is nice things, we don't have much Wikipedians interested in Jharkhand. There are many areas of Jharkhand related topics topics that can be improved. If you have problem regarding anything then you can ask it on my talk page. I will try to help you according to my knowledge of Wikipedia policies and experience. If you create any interesting Jharkhand related article then you can inform me, I will help you to appear that article on main page of Wikipedia in "did you know" section. You will feel nice and inspiring after seeing Jharkhand related article on main page which you created. Happy editing. -- Human 3015   TALK   09:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * See State Museum Hotwar -- Ankit  ( है?) 10:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. -- Ankit  ( है?) 10:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Bot automation at Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement
 Greetings WikiProject TAFI members!

Over the past two weeks, there has been extensive discussion on introducing bot automation to assist with maintenance of the Today's Articles for Improvement project. A bot has now been approved for trial and will carry out the weekly duties. The bots first run will occur around 00:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC) (midnight on Sunday).

If you have been assisting any of the weekly maintenance tasks, please refrain from doing so this week. The bot needs to be tested and proven it can do the job, and it only gets one chance per week. The tasks will include:
 * Adding the new scheduled article to Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement and removing the entry from Articles for improvement
 * Set up the schedule pages for the new TAFI, except the adding of an image and caption
 * Adding TAFI to the new article for improvement, remove TAFI from last week's article and add Former TAFI to the talk page
 * Notify relevant WikiProjects that the new TAFI is within their scope
 * Send a mass message to everyone on the notification list of the new TAFI selection

Updating the accomplishments and archiving selections is still done manually, along with daily tasks such as adding approved entries to the articles for improvement page. These will become automated in the near future.

We hope the bot proves to serve well, and by carrying out the routine housekeeping tasks we can boost the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the project. thanks you for your service in helping with the weekly tasks in the past, and for your cooperation during this trial period :)

Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • for all project notifications

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Species Artificial Life, Real Evolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandbox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month
Hi, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia Asian Month. Your article State Museum was created before November and the expansion during this month does not fulfill the requirement of the event. Please considering to expand more and after your work, you can remove the mark after the article name in the event page. Thank you!--AddisWang (talk) 21:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * OK -- Ankit fromहि है (talk) 10:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * , plesenow check my progress.--<span style="border:1px solid transparent;font-size:1.2em; font-family:Cyrillic,serif;background-color: #F0F98C"> Ankit  ( है?) 03:02, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm calling all the organizers working on it. Don't worry if you have one of your five unchecked article does not qualified, since we can not check all articles by the end of November due to the huge effort the Wikipedia Asian Month participants made, we will send you a postcard, under that situation. Thanks for join this event!--AddisWang (talk) 04:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Some Grammar Tips
Hey Ankit! You are doing pretty well on keeping your punctuation and spelling correct! Wikipedia is very grateful for that. I just have a small grammar error you should correct. When the letter, a, is used as an article (an article is the words you use to start a sentence, or state something, such as the, a, an) if the word following that letter (a) starts with any vowel (a, e, i, o, u), the article (a) will turn into the article (an). If you didn't get that, I'll make it easier for you below.

A octopus is very creepy. - Incorrect

An octopus is very creepy. - Correct

He is going to have a awesome trip. - Incorrect

He is going to have an awesome trip. - Correct

Thanks for reading this, and keep up the good work Ankit! FiendYT (talk) 18:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for help.--<span style="border:1px solid transparent;font-size:1.2em; font-family:Cyrillic,serif;background-color: #F0F98C"> Ankit  ( है?) 07:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)