User talk:श्रीमान २००२/Sept 2015

Reference errors on 30 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Modern Vidya Niketan ,aravali Hills page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=678596256 your edit] caused an empty citation error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F678596256%7CModern Vidya Niketan ,aravali Hills%5D%5D Ask for help])


 * I fixed this for you. – Fayenatic  L ondon 09:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Mvn
Category:Mvn, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 22:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Signature
Hi, you have edited your signature in the Preferences pane, but have removed all links back to this page. It should not be Aryan hindustan (talk) but: Aryan hindustan (talk) Please edit this section to see how that is coded, with brackets, then copy it and paste it into your Preferences. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Following on from the above, one possibility is that in trying to customise your signature you may have erroneously ticked the box labelled "Treat the above as wiki markup." in Special:Preferences. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * thanks

--	Aryan hindustan (talk) ,Aryan from Hindustan 09:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * this --&#60;span style&#61;&#34;font-size:1.0em&#59; font-family:Cyrillic,serif&#59;&#34;&#62;&#60;font colour &#61; silver &#62; Aryan &#60;/font&#62; hindustan (talk) ,Aryan from Hindustan&#60;/span&#62;  (talk) 07:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You must've not formatted it correctly.  Ana  r  chyte   10:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

English language, and how to draft an article
I do not want to discourage you, but are you sure you are ready to contribute to the English language Wikipedia? Your spelling and punctuation are not very good at the moment. Perhaps you would do better to work on the Hindi Wikipedia, and come back to the English encyclopaedia later on, when you have made more progress in your English language studies.

If you do wish to carry on working here, please learn to use the Preview button to see how a page looks, instead of saving many unsuccessful versions as you did at Uttarakhand. When preparing new articles or sections of an article, you can also use your own sandbox to create a draft – see the link at the top of the page. – Fayenatic  L ondon 14:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi I have read your message & now I will pay special attention to punctuation. But my speeling are normally according to Indian English.

--	Aryan hindustan (talk) ,Aryan from Hindustan 09:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I am sorry but "speeling" is actually "spelling" in all variations of English, including Indian English. It is necessary that editors on the English Wikipedia have either basic competency in English language prose, or an awareness of their weaknesses. It seems that you may lack both. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Priceless! I was thinking of "Anuuanl" and "pricipal" in your one-line article about a school,, and "educationl" & "collages" in the title of your deleted article linked above. – Fayenatic  L ondon 20:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Hey, you promised to pay special attention to punctuation. Please show to your English teacher or someone you can trust to explain the things you got wrong. – Fayenatic  L ondon 00:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gaudencio Hernández Burgos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Sauvira Kingdom
Hello, I just tagged Sauvira Kingdom as being in need of attention from an expert in Indian history and hoped you might be willing to take a look. I did my best with the formatting issues and added referencing, but the majority of the article is still just direct quotations from the Mahabharata. I didn't feel qualified to rephrase those accurately, so I left them alone. I considered taking out the quotations and just leaving the book:section citations, but the sections seemed too long for that — I'm thinking of a reader (especially one only familiar with Bible chapter:verse citations) trying to find what a book:section citation was referencing and being frustrated by the section being pages long. I also wasn't sure whether there really is still a factual dispute with the article, so I left that tag alone for now. Thanks in advance, GrammarFascist (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * --&#9;Aryan hindustan (talk) ,Aryan from Hindustan (talk) 07:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

3RR warning
Your recent editing history at National Museum of Natural History, New Delhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * OK & thanks

Signature
Here's what I think you're actually trying for:  Aryan hindustan (talk). Paste the code  into the signature box at Special:Preferences, click the "Treat as markup" box, and save. Job done. Yunshui 雲 水 08:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * thanks

National Museum of Natural History, New Delhi
Please stop trying to add lots of pictures to this article - especially pictures featuring people - this is not Facebook, we don't want pictures of your family and friends. You also included 2 pictures of the same turtle and some other poor quality photos of animals, which do not tell us much about the museum. The two potentially interesting exhibits, the round things, you did not explain. These might be worth adding back with a proper explanation of what they are. - Arjayay (talk) 08:25, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I feel partly to blame, Arjayay, as I had told Aryan hindustan that images of museum exhibits without museum visitors posing in them would be welcome. I failed to mention that the images would need to be large and well-lit enough for the exhibits to be clearly visible, or that such a short article really doesn't need more than 2–3 images, or that the images should have captions describing what's pictured. (The other image still in the article also needs a caption, Aryan hindustan, and you're probably the only one of the three of us with any idea which exhibit it depicts.) I replaced the stuffed cats image with the peacock image simply because it was possible to clean that one up to be of better quality. I felt the glare in the centre of the cats photo detracted from the image and made it (even more) confusing.


 * Depending on what the round things are, I would be willing to clean one of those images up so it's more visible and one could be used in the article; right now they are both quite dark. — GrammarFascist  contribs talk 20:43, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * hi did you mean -

-- Aryan fromHindustan (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * if so I have made a request here . They are the exebits focusing on formation of life, -- Aryan fromHindustan (talk) 07:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Neither picture is "a photo of the Natural history museum", they are both of some totally unidentified exhibit at the museum. You need to edit both descriptions to explain exactly: what each image is, what it is made of, what it represents, why it is important, how old it is, etc. Without this, the pictures are meaningless, and as they would not add any information to the article, they cannot be added to the article. - Arjayay (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * As I said above "These might be worth adding back with a proper explanation of what they are" - at the moment the description of both photos is "it is a photo of Natural history museam ,2011"