User talk:ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ

Rollback granted
Hi ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ. After reviewing your request, I have&#32;temporarily [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A%E0%A8%B0%E0%A8%B5%E0%A9%80_%E0%A8%B8%E0%A8%B9%E0%A8%BF%E0%A8%97%E0%A8%B2 enabled] rollback on your account&#32; for a period of 1 month. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Vanamonde (Talk) 23:04, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.


 * I wanted the rollback rights for longer time! ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 05:00, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi ਰਵੀ_ਸਹਿਗਲ. Can you help me understand why you reverted this edit as a minor edit with the summary "Reverting vandalism or test edit"? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * would you please consider revoking rollback rights? This user demonstrated an inability to differentiate between vandalistic and good-faith changes in this edit, and they doubled and tripled down on it. Though these edits weren't rollbacks, they evidence an understanding far below that required for responsible use of the advanced permission. Their actual rollback use is also problematic (e.g. this edit). Let me know if you think this should be brought up at ANI for wider review. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * At first glance those edits are indeed concerning. I would like to give ਰਵੀ_ਸਹਿਗਲ a chance to explain themselves, and expect that they will do so before making further edits. I don't think this need go to ANI, as I was the granting administrator; if I pull it due to misuse, I'm not undoing any actions besides my own. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ਰਵੀ_ਸਹਿਗਲ, you may have missed this, but Vanamonde93 said they expect you to respond to these concerns before you continue editing. You seem to have continued without response (unless I missed an email or something). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I have removed rollback, given the continued non-response. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions alert
Venkat TL (talk) 16:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yoga, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 16:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Calling valid edits as vandalism is a personal attack. Please desist from this behavior. Venkat TL (talk) 16:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Yoga, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Yoga. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Template misuse
what is this template for ? Special:Diff/1114230593/1114464968 Venkat TL (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)