User talk:నిజానికి

Ayurveda
Hi. As someone who has edited this article recently, I am bringing your attention to a proposed set of restrictions at Talk:Ayurveda. I see this action as necessary to allow harmonious editing at the article, and to prevent more blocks going forward. Best regards, --John (talk) 06:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Wide page
Why Yanam looks so wide? There is a scrollbar in footer, I can't figure out. నిజానికి (talk) 06:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * What operating system and browser are you using? It looks OK to me on Windows 7/Firefox33.1 and on IOS 8.1/Safari. JohnCD (talk) 12:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The co-ordinates are wrong in the infobox, when used with the location map, it places the pin well outwith the right hand margin of the page. Nick (talk) 13:15, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Removing help template because 's change to the map fixed the issue. —&#160;&#160; &#160;&#160;Bill W.&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160; (Talk)&#160;&#160;(Contrib)&#160;&#160; (User:Wtwilson3) &#160;&#160;— 14:30, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

A biography in bad form
Page of Gidugu Venkata Ramamoorty is in bad situation, I've removed multiple advertising links and much of the content has no sources. I don't know why notability issue is list on the header of the main page for a year. Where I can ask for help to make this page better? నిజానికి (talk) 06:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I have removed the "notability" tag, which indicated some user was concerned Ramamoorty wasn't significant enough to be the subject of an article at all. Whatever else the article's shortcomings, I'd say notability is pretty firmly established. What the article needs, however, are sources for the "Fight for ‘Vyavaharika Bhasha’" section, which currently looks more like some editor's personal opinion than a scholarly assessment of Ramamoorty's work and impact. The article says there are multiple critical works discussing Ramamoorty; we should summarize what those works have to say about him, not just point out that they exist.
 * WikiProjects would probably be good places to ask for help with this article, particularly WT:WikiProject India or maybe WT:WikiProject Literature. Huon (talk) 19:20, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
 Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  05:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Ayurveda
Hi, I suggest you revert this this edit as soon as you see this message, because it does appear to violate the 0RR restrictions imposed by the administrators. Someone (not me) started a discussion about you athttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:UserRights/%E0%B0%A8%E0%B0%BF%E0%B0%9C%E0%B0%BE%E0%B0%A8%E0%B0%BF%E0%B0%95%E0%B0%BF John's talk page, and I think you need to be a little more careful in the future. - A1candidate  23:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision and for joining an edit war at Ayurveda, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." --John (talk) 09:32, 21 March 2015 (UTC)