User talk:බිඟුවා

si:පරිශීලක සාකච්ඡාව:බිඟුවා

Proposed deletion of Lordehytta


The article Lordehytta has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable cottage. No reliable sources so unverifiable. No claim to notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 18:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Lordehytta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lordehytta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lordehytta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 06:08, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd like to see the community discuss whether this article meets Wikipedia's standards for notability, just as every other article is required to meet them. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 06:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oky. Then we can wait. -- බිඟුවා  සාකච්ඡාව 06:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest you take part in the discussion and voice your opinion there too. If there are further sources available that demonstrate the notability of this building, and especially how it meets WP:GNG, then please make those known in the discussion and add them to the article. If the building is notable, I'd like to see the article kept (and will say so in the discussion). Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 06:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?
Hi බිඟුවා, You recently received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions: You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchuk@undefinedwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
 * 2) If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
 * 3) What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?