User talk:სოფო კვაჭაძე

Speedy deletion nomination of GEC Consulting


A tag has been placed on GEC Consulting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * looks like this warning was ignored ↓↓↓. Best,GPL93 (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, it's at least nowhere near as bad as it was; the prior version was far more blatantly promotional. So, I suppose may as well let the AfD settle it. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of GEC Consulting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GEC Consulting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/GEC Consulting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Singularity42 (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)