User talk:ព្រះមហាក្សត្ររាជ

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from French Guiana into Cayenne. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Your recent editing history at Template:Largest urban centers of the European Union shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Metropolitan areas is stable version from months, your change has been reverted - disputed changes, if you want new changes, must to be consensus per Wikipedia:CYCLE. This is last warning! Subtropical -man  ( ✉  | en-2 ) 01:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Blanking?
Just FYI, it looks like you accidentally blanked most of Réunion. Not sure what you did there in saving your edit but you might not want to do that again -- I've reverted the change you made. Feel free to re-add the updated figures though. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 17:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Collaboration at French colonial empire
Thanks for your contributions to French colonial empire. I notice that some of your edits have been reverted, and you've been letting your displeasure be known in edit summary comments, including an unfounded accusation of WP:OWNership. In a cursory evaluation of recent edits, 's reverts of your edits are based on sound Wikipedia policy or guidelines, mostly on the basis of inadequate sourcing. Although you've been around for some years, you're still nearly a brand new editor based on your ~500 edits. While nobody likes to have their work reverted, and feeling frustrated is a normal reaction, please do not take it out on other editors, but assume good faith that they are acting to improve the encyclopedia, in this case, by monitoring the WP:Verifiability of the article and removing or altering edits that are non-compliant. If you don't understand the reason for the reverts or don't agree with them, the proper course of action is to raise a discussion on the Talk page to discuss the content disagreement. (I see that that conversation has been started.) Other methods of dispute resolution are available to you, if that doesn't work out. But in the meantime, please keep your cool with other editors, and comment on the article content and how to improve it, not on other editors, both in the edit summary and on the article Talk pages. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my Talk page; you can also get help at the WP:Help desk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 06:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Functional area (France), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brest and Nancy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

French Guiana articles…!
Could you please do NOT EDIT French Guiana articles ?! You are editing wrong and deleting good editing! I lived in this territory, I was born and raised and you just came and Delete the beautiful pictures I put to put horrible ones. Don’t make any edit on articles about French Guiana. Thank you, have a good day ! PouLagwiyann (talk) 05:09, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

About your So Called War !
I’m gonna stop this nonsense, when you gonna stop deleting my edit. You want me to treat fairly, do the same first. My goal is NOT to engage in a War, I’m just trying to put better images to Improve the quality of these articles about French Guiana, my motherland, as usual and you, you come and delete my edits. I even sent you a message here in the past you NEVER answered and you came on my page play the victim ?! So Why ?? Can you explain me why ? What did I’ve done to You ? What’s your problem with French Guiana ? I wanna do good even better for my region that I’m actually living in. And you why do you do this ??? PouLagwiyann (talk) 14:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The fact that it is your "motherland" does not give you any superior right to edit those articles or own them. Any editor is entitled to put pictures as they see fit, and the fact you don't accept any other pictures but yours in the infoboxes of these cities is a clear case of WP:OWN. ព្រះមហាក្សត្ររាជ (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don’t think that I own any articles of Wikipedia. It’s just You, making edits without sources about subjects that you CLEARLY don’t know about. You even received some messages about Réunion island, other French overseas regions edits that you’ve made got reversed because your edits was not sourced and justified, so before coming on my page crying. Look from your side if everything is okay because I’m Again Not the only One thinking that you’re making Weird edits on Wikipedia…! PouLagwiyann (talk) 14:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

General reminder about edit warring
This is a general reminder to re-read Wikipedia's guideline about edit-warring. A couple months ago, you and another editor engaged in slow edit warring over a period of weeks, in at Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni (more recently in ), which finally ended when the other editor stopped reverting. Both of you were equally to blame in that case. Because this is an old situation, nothing needs to be done about it now, but had I noticed it at the time, I would have brought you both to the Edit warring noticeboard. Going forward, please remember that it doesn't matter "who is right" or "who reverted first"–an edit war is harmful to the encyclopedia, regardless. If you feel someone is edit warring in the future, please do not revert–instead, leave a message on their user talk page in a neutral tone, or use the Edit warring template, which will do it for you. Thanks, and happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 22:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)