User talk:ⵓⵛⵛⴻⵏ

October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Berbers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Berbers was changed by ⵓⵛⵛⴻⵏ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953 on 2015-10-30T22:08:44+00:00.

Recent edit to Arabs
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Arabs without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

ⵓⵛⵛⴻⵏ, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

November 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Neil N  talk to me 14:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Major unexplained change on Arabs
Hello. I've reverted your major unexplained change on Arabs. Some of the changes were copy edits, but others required explanation. I would suggest making your contributions incrementally so that controversial changes can be dealt with individually. Thanks. Eperoton (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)