User talk:エグチキチー

May 2024
Hello, I'm NoobThreePointOh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Filet-O-Fish without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ronald McDonald House Charities, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lucky Pierrot, you may be blocked from editing. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —Smalljim 12:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * In case any administrator is wondering, I loosely translated this into "If you tried to improve the content of the page, it would be considered vandalism and you would be blocked" from Google Translate. I'm not sure if this is really what they're saying, but uh... Google Translate isn't always wrong. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Whoops. Without the period, it translates into "When I tried to improve the page content, it was considered vandalism and I was blocked." My fault on that part. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * (ec) ChatGPT offers: "It is unfair that I was blocked and considered a vandal when I tried to improve the page content." —Smalljim  12:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Smalljim I forgot to mention that this user is actually globally locked; they've been blocked on de.wiki for "nonsensical edits" (I think). NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Useful to know, thanks. —Smalljim  13:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)