User talk:京都東

Your draft article, Draft:Kyoto-Higashi Interchange


Hello, 京都東. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kyoto-Higashi Interchange".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

References and other queries
Thank you for your contributions to the English Wikipedia, however I've noticed the references you have included in many of the articles you have created such as, Kyoto-higashi Interchange are written entirely in Japanese. These references need to include both their original Japanese title and an English translation of their title.

Also please note that not every interchange along a highway is not notable enough to warrant their own individual articles on English Wikipedia. See Articles for deletion/Gainesville Interchange for an example of why this is. Major interchanges with significant news coverage may warrant their own article, but a minor interchange such as the Gainesville Interchange or one like Wake Interchange should probably not have their own articles. Thank you  ⑉⑉ Mccunicano  ☕️  01:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Yokkaichi Interchange for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yokkaichi Interchange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yokkaichi Interchange until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ⑉⑉ Mccunicano ☕️  01:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wake Interchange


The article Wake Interchange has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable interchange. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOROAD."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of San'yō Interchange


The article San'yō Interchange has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability not established for highway interchange with substantive sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 07:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2023
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Empire of Japan. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 01:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)