User talk:凰兰时罗/Archives/2016/October

Speedy deletion nomination of Booyami
Hello 凰兰时罗,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Booyami for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

I disagree with your interpretation.
 * 1) I'm not affiliated with this company in any way. I'm simply writing about regional business and non-profit entities.
 * 2) The article is based exclusively on credible sources. No information was taken from the company's websites.
 * 3) Alongside positive information, the article includes negative or questionable information  (changes in the business model, failure to raise planned amounts of money, difficulties with selling Finagraph to financial institutions.)  --凰兰时罗 (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I just re-read WP:SPAM that serves as the basis for your nomination. Look, to nominate the article for speedy deletion, you have to show that the article is a "blatant example of advertising masquerading as article." You'll have to agree that this is definitely not the case here.
 * Furthermore, by "advertising" WP:SPAM means "solicitations for a business, product or service, or are public relations pieces designed to promote a company or individual." There is no solicitations in the article whatsoever, and as I mentioned above, next to positive information (from credible sources), there is negative information. That means that the article won't qualify for "slow deletion" either.
 * Look, I understand that you're just trying to make positive contributions, and you work hard to make sure that Wikipedia is getting better by the day. But we are human, and we all make mistakes. The rule says "a differentiation should be made between spam articles and legitimate articles about commercial entities." I think in this particular case you didn't make this differentiation, and your nomination is incorrect. Since you are not replying (probably stepped away from your computer), I'll remove the template for now. If you insist on it, we will put it back, and I'll proceed to look for a second opinion. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * It is not done to remove speedy delete notices from articles you wote yourself. As for @as per discussion on talk page'...it takes two to have a discussion. All you did was state your weak case.TheLongTone (talk) 15:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Please provide more specific arguments. My 'weak case' cites the rules. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Borrowing base, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Credit line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Concrete Herald, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Concrete Heritage Museum) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Concrete Heritage Museum, 凰兰时罗!

Wikipedia editor MB298 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for creating!"

To reply, leave a comment on MB298's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Explaining
I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Got it. I didn't realize that even user pages are patrolled. Thanks for the explanation! 凰兰时罗 (talk) 00:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Charles Dwelley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Dwelley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charles Dwelley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Concrete Herald for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Concrete Herald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Concrete Herald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)