User talk:天竺鼠

Cai Pei
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cai Pei, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.yesasia.com/global/cai-pei-lin/0-aid39068-0-bpt.47-en/list.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * My Article perfectly unrelated that website! Why this bot attached Copyright Infringement?--天竺鼠 (cavy) (talk) 12:13, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Apologies. The bot seems to be completely in error and I have restored the article. Deb (talk) 12:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Dear Deb, thank you very much for your quickly correspondence! --天竺鼠 (cavy) (talk) 12:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikkim Rajya Manch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Localism ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sikkim_Rajya_Manch check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sikkim_Rajya_Manch?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Bharatiya Janata Party, Sikkim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharatiya Janata Party, Sikkim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bharatiya Janata Party, Sikkim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Nima Lepcha
Hello, 天竺鼠

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Akhiljaxxn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Nima Lepcha, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Nima Lepcha.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Janata Party, Sikkim Unit for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janata Party, Sikkim Unit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Janata Party, Sikkim Unit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 16:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)