User talk:山に何

April 2022
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Hades, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. NebY (talk) 20:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Overlinking and Oxford commas
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Using edit summaries that contradict the edits made
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Short descriptions
Please read Short_description before making futher edits to those; we don't use phrases like "this article explains" in a short description. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:32, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Hi - you have been making lots of changes which seem to make the articles worse. Please don't introduce contractions into articles (MOS:CONTRACTIONS), don't link to disambiguation pages, and don't do weird stuff like this which I can think of no good reason for. I assume these are good faith mistakes on your part, but if people are having to go around after you fixing your mistakes, it's disruptive. Thank you Girth Summit  (blether)  17:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Charles III. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 18:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charles III. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 18:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @I dream of horses k 山に何 (talk) 18:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 18:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Bbb23 Please unlock me, I was showing my mother how anyone can change anything on Wikipedia and that the internet has fake news. 山に何 (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)