User talk:山吹色の御菓子

Your "tax evade" edits at User talk:Jimbo Wales
I am just a plain user of this website, but I am fairly sure that you should contact directly the Wikimedia Foundation. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * It contacted Wikimedia Foundation one year ago. However, it was disregarded. it warns many times. --山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 16:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Then perhaps people believe your claim is without merit. Personally, I'm kinda tired of seeing this go on for the past YEAR. Tarc (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * If the problem does not have interest, you please do not participate. Otherwise you become the aiding and abetting of the tax evasion.--山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 04:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * What are you going to do, sue me? Tarc (talk) 05:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * You know that it is illegal. However, you are doing the act.Isn't it a crime? --山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 06:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't think any crime has been committed. (I am not a lawyer, but I think you are not a lawyer either.) Are you suggesting that some sort of legal action will be taken? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * In Japan, it is asked tax evasion.By a Japanese taxation office, a fine is inflicted in Jimbo.--山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, I don't think that Japanese law is relevant. WMF's servers are based in Florida, and therefore it must only obey Florida state and US federal laws. GoogolplexForce (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * However, Wikimedia meetups was executed in Japan. The domain and the server of "wikipedia.jp" are set up in Japan. WMF and Jimbo granted a patent to it. Help was given to it. In the Japan tax law, WMF and Jimbo are recognized as a corporation by a taxation office, and it is taxed.--山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Informational note: this is to let you know that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, 28bytes (talk) 14:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 15:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I reported it to WMF
I reported it to WMF before this. I discussed it until Mike Godwin（General Counsel Wikimedia Foundation） and October 23 last year.He has not received the report of the event though he was General Counsel. It was said that they would not have been permitted. When he retired from it, it was said "Please direct your queries to Alisa Key or to some other representative of the Foundation".I hear it to Jimmy Wales because there is no answer though it questioned the WMF director.

Because I thought that a Japanese user did wrong, I appealed to Ombudsman commission（Ombudsman User:Carkuni） on November 9, last year.


 * 1) wikipedia日本語版のコミュニティでは、ウィキメディア財団やジミー・ウェールズが関与しないと確認されていること.
 * 2) 当然、wikipedia日本語版ではウィキメディア財団の事務局行動やジミー・ウェールズ創設者の権限は否定されていること.
 * 3) wikipedia日本語版のコミュニティでは、日本国内に運営法人を設立してwikipedia日本語版の経営権譲渡を受ける計画であること.
 * 4) そのためにja:User:Tietewは「wikipedia.jp」のドメインを取得し、運営していること.
 * 5) ウィキメディア財団は公式に許諾をしていないのに取得・運営し、Info-jaチームを結成していること.
 * 6) 「wikipedia.jp」は、プライバシーポリシーが無く、無法状態になっていること. 収集されたデータが不正利用されている恐れがあること.
 * 7) ja:wikipedia:Info-jaチームは、ウィキメディア財団が許可していないのに、ja:wikipedia:事務局行動を独自に行使したり、プライバシーポリシーに反して、Info-jaチームが警察機関の任意照会に回答をおこなっていること.
 * 8) ウイキペディア日本語版では、コミュニティの合意が無いのにかかわらず、テンプレートが貼られていることで方針とガイドラインが決定していること.
 * 9) ウイキペディア日本語版においては、投稿ブロックの方針が公式な方針ではなく草案であるために、管理者は自由に、あらゆる理由であっても権限行使することができる.
 * 10) 日本語版では、wikipedia方針とガイドラインにおいて英語版の「百科事典の一部ではありません」を拒否しているため、方針やガイドラインを議論すること自体に方針とガイドラインが適用される.
 * 11) よって、管理者の権限に関する問題を一般利用者が指摘することが荒らし行為となり、ブロック対象となっていること. また、これを理由としたブロックされている利用者が多数存在すること. ブロックされた利用者の救済措置を講しること.
 * 12) 管理者のja:User:Tietewが、自動辞任となっているのにもかかわらず管理者権限を返還しないことUser_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_64.
 * 現時点においても日本語版では自動辞任規定を廃止しておらず、Tietew氏の信任の確認、適用除外の合意はされていない. よって、権限の濫用を行っているので権限剥奪、被害救済を行うこと.


 * 1) ウィキペディアのチェックユーザー権限保持者が、プライバシー・ポリシーに違反してアンサイクロペディア日本語版管理者へチェックユーザー情報を提供していること. アンサイクロペディア日本語版管理者は、ウィキペディアから提供されたチェックユーザー情報を根拠に投稿ブロックを行っている.

However, there is no answer up to the present time. Then, I could do nothing but hear and became Jimmy Wales. I want you to teach it if there is the person in charge elsewhere. I contact it there.--山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 12:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting us know the steps you have taken to contact people about your concerns. However, since this is the English Wikipedia, there is nothing any of us can do about the Japanese Wikipedia, or about tax concerns in Japan, or about general Wikimedia Foundation issues that do not relate to the English Wikipedia. If the Japanese tax authorities have any concerns, then presumably they will be in touch in due course. It would be best if you left them to handle it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Because Jimbo does not watch meta frequently, I say that I want you to write it on the user talking page of English Wikipedia. It is his hope to write here.Please show it if there are appropriate other places.If you do not prove it, duty to pay tax occurs. English Wikipedia must pay its tax. There are the relations in English Wikipedia.--山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 15:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Jimbo has already been advised about this. There is no reason to send him the same information again. If you wish to give tax advice to people, I recommend that you enrol in a course of study to become a tax lawyer or financial adviser in the appropriate jurisdiction. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Role of Jimmy Wales The question on the authority has not been answered yet. There are not a wikipedia.jp domain and the answer of the problem of the server.He doesn't answer. May I think that it permitted it?--山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * You may indeed think that. We can't control what you think. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I do not think.Japanese Wikipedia community are convinced that the self was permitted to behave,Because English Wikipedia doesn't clarify the attitude. --山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 17:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I do not think that you are a good spokesperson for what the Japanese Wikipedia community thinks. They decided to ban you from the Japanese Wikipedia. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Because Japanese Wikipedia community opposed the resolution to which I refuse the authority of Wikimedia Foundation and Jimmy Wales, it has been blocked. In Japanese Wikipedia, Office actions（ja:Wikipedia:事務局行動） and Revision deletion(版指定削除の方針), etc. are rejected. --山吹色の御菓子 (talk) 04:38, 17 March 2011 (UTC)