User talk:枫叶金色的

Your addition to Anthropology has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Vsmith (talk) 12:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Gerontology has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Vsmith (talk) 12:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Scientific Research Publishing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, since you have made the same edits as before, with not even an acknowledgement of the requests here to stop, and with no sign of making constructive contributions to the encyclopedia, I have blocked you indefinitely. As it already says above, you may appeal the block. If you do so with an apology for your past behavior and a promise to respect copyrights and avoid conflicts of interest in your future edits, the appeal is likely to be granted. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)