User talk:楊千呱

Welcome ! 

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Jax 0677, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your, a link to this talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. ou can  for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you  put  on.

 Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 20:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jax_0677&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Hello, 楊千呱, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Chinese; did you know there is a Chinese Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts!

您好，楊千呱. 歡迎來訪英文版的維基百科. 雖然我們隨時歡迎你在英文版維基百科編輯，但是你這次執筆所使用的英文並未達到英文版維基百科所需求的水準. 若是你們不介意的話，你們可以在中文版維基百科編輯. 感謝你們參加維基百科. George Ho (talk) 23:58, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

September 2015
Your recent editing history at Rebel Heart Tour shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Widr (talk) 20:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Rebel Heart Tour
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * There is an open discussion at Talk:Rebel_Heart_Tour where consensus should first be acieved and then further changes to this issue should be made. You have already crossed 3RR and you are using IPs as socks to continue the change in Born This Way Ball article. Face up and stop this please. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 11:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Sorry. I'm not the only one who keeps editing. You should also block him/her as well. Be fair please.—User:楊千呱 1:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC+8)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 13:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
— Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 13:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Blocked 2 weeks for resumption of edit-warring
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:37, 19 September 2015 (UTC)