User talk:维瓦



Hello, 维瓦, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 03:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN
Hi there. Please can you leave edit summaries to explain your edits? It is unclear as to the purpose of your edits at Scotland but it looks like reading WP:NOTBROKEN would be informative. Mutt Lunker (talk) 08:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Will you please pay heed, as requested. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Like I wrote below, there is no need to capitalize arms. I made the same edit at Scotland and you did not revert it. 维瓦 (talk) 20:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If I had seen it, maybe I should have. That I haven't corrected all the other errors in Wikipedia doesn't block me from addressing this one. Whether there is no need to do something is immaterial, there is a guideline stating that what you are habitually and systematically doing to correct things that are not incorrect is "generally a time-wasting exercise". You're not exempt and you're certainly wasting my time with your persistence. You can't plead ignorance any more and I'll regard a resumption as disruptive in future. Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:51, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh will you desist with this disruptive messing about? As nearly every edit you make appears to contain a NOTBROKEN element I'm no longer inclined to check/address them individually and think it appropriate to revert them en masse. If you get in there quick you may self-revert this aspect of your edits but my patience has worn thin. Mutt Lunker (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Scotland, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Per the previous post re WP:NOTBROKEN, please explain yourself or desist. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * According to Piped link links should not be longer than necessary. 维瓦 (talk) 16:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There were three parts to the edit, that applies to only one of them and you should explain in the edit summary. Mutt Lunker (talk) 19:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The article name is In my defens God me defend. There is no need for capitals. 维瓦 (talk) 23:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

If you have any points to make re the article, make them at the article talk page. Only reinstate the edits if you gain consensus after a reasonable time. See WP:BRD. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samsung. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. As above. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Rodman. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.