User talk:美好的时光好孩子

December 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Organ (biology) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Organ (biology) was changed by 美好的时光好孩子 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929328 on 2021-12-28T18:40:52+00:00

"Õŕªņģę" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Õŕªņģę and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Doug Weller talk 15:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

"Qűė" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Qűė and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Doug Weller talk 15:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

"قمر" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect قمر and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Doug Weller talk 15:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Please don't change the spelling of Quran
I agree there are other spelling, but as this is the one used in our article on it, it should be used elsewhere as well. Doug Weller talk 15:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

"حفظ" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect حفظ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Doug Weller talk 08:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

You need to read the guidelines for redirects.
WP:REDIRECT says " redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created.". Please also read the discussions about your redirects above to see what other editors have said. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 08:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Human have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Human was changed by 美好的时光好孩子 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96996 on 2022-01-24T22:37:26+00:00

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  22:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you continue to make similar edits to Human you will be blocked from the article
at least. Doug Weller talk 13:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Why? 美好的时光好孩子 (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Because we are a mainstream encyclopedia and accept that humans are just another type of mammal/animal. Your edits are disruptive. Doug Weller  talk 15:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Do you try to say that this website is an non-theist encyclopaedia which doesn't take religions seriously and therefore is not neutral? If what you try to say is this, then you have to let everyone know it. So nobody will come and try to make pages neutral. I just tried to show how I feel when article promotes the claim that "humans are animals"; it feels biased to me. If you neglect the possibility of religion to be truth, you also have to accept that you're biased towards non-theism. 美好的时光好孩子 (talk) 15:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Don't remove the infobox Kamen Rider Falcon (talk) 16:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * No, I mean that Wikipedia is neutral towards all religions. This means we don't pick one and say it's true. It is also a mainstream encyclopedia that accepts evolutionary theory. And of course most Christian denominations accept evolution. You seem to be biased against them. Doug Weller  talk 16:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Human) for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 16:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of دونالد ابن دونالد الترامب


A tag has been placed on دونالد ابن دونالد الترامب requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"R3 - if we had a WP:RFFL it should be 'دونالد الترامب', not expanded out, right?"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Happy editing-- IAm Chaos  21:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sheikh Zubayr


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Sheikh Zubayr, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~Styyx Talk ? 17:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)