User talk:銚電神

Welcome ! 

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm DAJF, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your, a link to this talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. ou can  for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you  put  on.

 Sincerely, DAJF (talk) 08:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DAJF&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

March 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to KiHa E130 series does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! DAJF (talk) 01:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Image used in KiHa E130 series article
Hi. As mentioned above, I see you re-added your photo to the KiHa E130 series article without comment, but I wonder if you can explain why you think this improves the article. I have added a comment to the article's Talk page, so it's probably best if you comment there, but did you not notice that the new image was both tilted (correctable) and actually blurred? I can understand that you might be keen to add your own photos to Wikipedia articles, but please try to be objective about the quality. I am also curious as to why you did not try to add them to the corresponding Japanese articles. Anyway, I await your comments. --DAJF (talk) 01:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Azusa (train), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. DAJF (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on E233 series. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.I notice you have been banned on Japanese Wikipedia for disruptive editing and sock-puppetry, so I hope you can be more communicative and constructive on this project. --DAJF (talk) 14:07, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Issues with images added to articles
Hi again. I was still hoping you would comment on the KiHa E130 series Talk page, but but a week has now passed, and you continue to replace good quality images from Commons with images you yourself have uploaded, but which are sadly not of very good quality. Would you be kind enough to add your opinions on the relevant discussions at Talk:E233 series and Talk:E257 series Also, could you please be courteous and make sure you include an edit summary when you make changes, and not mark such edits as "minor", as this is considered bad form. --DAJF (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Unreferenced fundamental changes
Hello, I'm Aaron-Tripel. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Utsunomiya Line, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aaron-Tripel (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * And again, again, again...--Aaron-Tripel (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Azusa (train) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. DAJF (talk) 01:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)