User talk:陳建民

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:陳建民/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:陳建民/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:%E9%99%B3%E5%BB%BA%E6%B0%91/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:%E9%99%B3%E5%BB%BA%E6%B0%91/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:陳建民/sandbox
Hello, 陳建民. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:陳建民/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bottom Simulating Reflectors


A tag has been placed on Draft:Bottom Simulating Reflectors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2016GL069443 and https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069443. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kaseng55 (talk) 02:03, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seismic Stratigraphy has been accepted
 Seismic Stratigraphy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Seismic_Stratigraphy help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! RPSkokie (talk) 07:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Antarctic offshore geologic exploration for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antarctic offshore geologic exploration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antarctic offshore geologic exploration until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mys_721tx (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Neogene Mediterranean desiccation and mega-flooding for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neogene Mediterranean desiccation and mega-flooding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Neogene Mediterranean desiccation and mega-flooding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bottom Simulating Reflectors has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bottom Simulating Reflectors. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bottom Simulating Reflectors has been accepted
 Bottom Simulating Reflectors, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Bottom_Simulating_Reflectors help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Rusalkii (talk) 15:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the article! It looks like an interesting topic, but the article is very hard to understand for non-technical readers (i.e. me) and as Timtrent said, the sources being unlinked makes it very hard to follow up on any of the references. I've accepted it, but it'd be great if you could try to fix those issues (I know that writing for a non-technical audience is hard! but the source links at least should be easier). Rusalkii  (talk) 15:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I would certainly try later in the progress. Since some of the technical terms are already known among professionals, to elaborate these terms requires in depth search for literature which could be cited for the reference. 172.1.153.105 (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Your edit to Tectonics of the South China Sea has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)


 * All edit text comes from publications as cited. Could you please point out which part of edited text has copyrighted material.
 * Thanks 陳建民 (talk) 02:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)