User talk:青鬼よし

April 2008
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Canterbury Tail  talk  18:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

narasu
Hello 青鬼よし. Thanks for the edits to Nara period. As I have those books, I cleaned some of the text and gave full bibliographic details. However, there are several issues: Comments? Regards, Bendono (talk) 06:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It seems pointless to give the Nihon Shoki text twice from two books giving the same text. Should remove one.
 * 2) The Man'yōshū poems are certainly valid for the verb narasu. However, the context is not about the geographical place Nara, so are of no real value to the article. I have added them to 平す where they are more appropriate. I suggest removing them from the article.
 * 3) Citing the full 8th century text is of so limited value to most readers. I think it is better to just give the bibliographic info and let the scholars go to a library and look it up. Thus I would remove it, too.

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Quote
That verbose comment you deleted was a quote " so you can't change it. Sorry buddy :)--4.23.83.100 (talk) 20:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Mounted archery
Many thanks for your help. Your English is infinitely better than my Japanese! I hope that the section now conveys a correct meaning. Richard Keatinge (talk) 20:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Get approvals before editing
You have recently edited section of Baekje article, please note you must discuss it first at the talk page before editing it. Unless it's minor grammar or spelling corrections. If you going to use Nihon Shoeki as reference then provide the sources as well. Editing any article without approvals is not allowed in Wikipedia unless you are reputable scholars.--Korsentry 03:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry (talk • contribs)
 * There is no such rule. Stop wikilawyering. Anyone is free to edit. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 07:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 李博杰 is correct. Please do not tell people to not edit without approval as there is no such policy or guideline on WIkipedia except in cases of controversial edits. In such a case, it is suggested that you first discuss a controversial edit if you are aware it may be controversial. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I wrote my opinion about Baekje in TalkPage. Please let me hear your opinion.--青鬼よし (talk) 14:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

=Shōfuku-ji (Higashimurayama)= I have removed your latest edits of Shōfuku-ji (Higashimurayama). The English grammar was not clear and the reference to Korea was removed by you for an unspecified reason. If you wish to remove the Korean reference, please explain first in the talk page since a proper source was cited. Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 23:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I think that your comments on my talk page are appropriate for the main article itself. So I moved them to there. Plesae take a look the the discussion on Shōfuku-ji (Higashimurayama). Bryan MacKinnon (talk) 23:53, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Warning for your introducing deliberate factual error
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Caspian blue 16:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

= August 2009 =

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Caspian blue 16:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Nov 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Kofun has been reverted. Political pressure of current Korean government and archaeological development in Korea is totally irrelevant to the megalithic tombs or tumuli in Japan, constructed between early 3rd century and early 7th century, aka the Kofun. Please get the fact that Wikipedia is a dictionary, and requires neutral point of view to edit. Does your head understand the wikipedia rules? if not, please read the rules and write about the article, not about Korea.

Your entry about newly found keyhole tombs built around the 5th to the 6th century found in areas of ancient Gaya confederacy in South Korea,is very helpful, however if owners of the tomb is unknown and research is under progress, one should state that research is under progress, period. Neutral point of view is important. Writing that Korean and Japanese scholars being interested about the site is not helpful. Archaeologists are interested in it, i'm sure.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Reference to external material is always welcomed in wikipedia. However, it does not mean you can rip off the whole front page of NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC NEWS article. We call it fair use policy, aka reference, and if you want to write about the article, it must be in your own words. Copy and Paste is NOT called a reference, and wikipedia does not tolerate thief of copyrighted material. Please get this through your head. 431e5d45 (talk) 01:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Caspian blue 14:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war and Korea under Japanese rule. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Caspian blue 14:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Another 3RR waring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Caspian blue 02:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock puppet
You have been. (blocked by –MuZemike 17:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.


 * For your information, see Sockpuppet investigations/Azukimonaka
 * Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/Azukimonaka (a chronicle of the sockpuppeter's sockpuppetry and disruption going back to at least two and half years or four years ago.)
 * The user had also operated a Wiki-based blog/forum named my former name via WP:CHU (www3.atwiki.jp/apple-tree/pages/1.html which was deleted on Feb.2009) for over a half year to Wikistalk and hound me as well as recruit Meatpuppeters via Email to harass me. The sockpuppeter's email address matches to his revealed email address on the blog and 青鬼よし's English Wiki user page.
 * The user not only advocated the blog but also even impersonated me on several anti-Korean forums within 2channel.(archived pagetranslation of the cache) 青鬼よし also has refused to comment about the match of the email addess.--Caspian blue 20:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Block evasions during the "this time indefinite block" (of course previous countless block evasions): and  from internet cafes as he confessed. --Caspian blue 20:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Caspian blue, Please Do not write the lie. You have a grudge against me because I pointed out your lie. It was Japanese cuisine that I pointed out your lie for the first time.
 * you insisted, "The origin of Japanese chopsticks is Korea". I quoted the technical books, and explained "Japanese chopstick are Chinese origins". You quoted "The History and Culture of Japanese Food （ISBN 0710306571） page71", and insisted, "Korea influenced chopsticks". However, your quotation was a lie. The content of the book can be inspected with Google. Your lie was easily seen through. Caspian blue stopped discussing. And, Caspian blue slandered users who had seen through his lie, saying that "Sock of Azukimonaka".
 * This was the first contact of us. The next contact was "Japanese history of Kofun Period".　You falsified the source again. Next, shall I explain it?　（However, my time is limited. Therefore, the priority of "Reply to you" is low. I might leave you. Sorry.）
 * At this point, giving a WP:NPA warning to you for your vicious and outright lying would be meaningless. The content was written by an admin whose real life specialty is in gastronomy. Of course, I have no reason to mistrust his credential than your blanking campaign and you've been warned for your disruptive behaviors by admins and other editors. I don't feel the need to say about your another falsification on Kofun period, and Nara period as well as many original research to Korea under Japanese rule. You can not even refute your shameful blog to harass me. I have kept all emails from the site manager and captured your harassment of me, and the email address. Your falsification campaign and harassment for years are splendid. Please don't abuse Wikipedia for your agenda. You've been block-evading and countlessly been blocked. Please find other places for peace.--Caspian blue 17:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)