User talk:飞向心的世

Speedy deletion nomination of Freien Wiki


A tag has been placed on Freien Wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Freien Wiki and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 11:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeeeep


A tag has been placed on Jeeeep, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Jeep constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with @dhd. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with @dhd. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Ute in DC (talk) 22:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of @dhd


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as @dhd, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BurtAlert (talk) 22:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)