User talk:포모사

Welcome!
Hello, Jang8962, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pro Worldcup, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Pro Worldcup


A tag has been placed on Pro Worldcup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Pro Worldcup, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Pro Worldcup, you may be blocked from editing. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  02:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Pro Worldcup. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  02:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pro Worldcup
Hello Jang8962,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pro Worldcup for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meiloorun  (talk) 🍁 07:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Pro Worldcup. Meiloorun  (talk) 🍁 07:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Block
Hi. You've been blocked from editing due to disruption. If you wish to be unblocked, please state the reason below. Thanks. El_C 07:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

ㄴto. El_C,User:Meiloorun im (ip : 221.140.97.92, block id : #7297301) just i wanted to make a page about that and i need more time. i didnt write more contents. its difficult to find impormations. so i need more time. thank u. i wanna use the wikipedia.. pleassssssse Not to mean anything bad

im.. just,,
to. El_C im (ip : 221.140.97.92, block id : #7297301) just i wanted to make a page about that and i need more time. i didnt write more contents. its difficult to find impormations. so i need more time. thank u. i wanna use the wikipedia.. pleassssssse Not to mean anything bad
 * Well, you're going to need to promise to stop disrupting Wikipedia, including but not limited to: recreating Pro Worldcup (unless you can prove its notability by citing reliable sources), and restricting tests to your sandbox. El_C 08:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

okay, i will. thanks for your adviceEl_C


 * You're welcome. Please be careful with edits from now on. El_C 08:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)


 * okay, keep up the good work..

Your contributed article, 야구화


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 야구화. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Baseball clothing and equipment. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Baseball clothing and equipment – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Note
--Neil N  talk to me 15:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Drewmutt. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  02:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * .......... why did edit?? Am i wrong???? or Did i behave unfairly?? i donno your intentions.. or Are u japanese?? lol... Jangg8962 (talk) 02:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Neil N  talk to me 03:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * i cant understand...japan and korea -> korea and japan whats wrong with that???? its not fair.. Jangg8962 (talk) 09:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * u have to behave basic in Five pillars-"Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view"and "Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Don't break the rule!!! Jangg8962 (talk) 10:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision and for lame name order changes specifically warned against - "All edits that consist merely of changing around the order of mentioning the two countries ("Japanese-Korean" vs. "Korean-Japanese", etc.), or edits that mess with the naming of "Japan Sea"/"East Sea", "Liancourt Rocks"/"Dokdo", etc., are strictly forbidden, unless they have been discussed and reached consensus in advance.", you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Neil N  talk to me 11:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
 * hello.. I can't understand your judgment.. Am I wrong???? Just I change "Japan and Korea" -> "Korea and Japan".. But, Is that wrong? or was it damaged by someone? It's not be fairly..BE FAIRLY!! Don't think the power of Japan.. You can be fairly.. JUST..Umm..please.. If I you can be fairly. I can be blocked to you... Jangg8962 (talk) 11:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's wrong. "All edits that consist merely of changing around the order of mentioning the two countries ("Japanese-Korean" vs. "Korean-Japanese", etc.), or edits that mess with the naming of "Japan Sea"/"East Sea", "Liancourt Rocks"/"Dokdo", etc., are strictly forbidden..." Please take your nationalistic fervor elsewhere. --Neil N  talk to me</i> 15:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay..it just my nationalistic fervor... But it's fact that you are unfairly. and Dokdo is Korean territory.. It's fact. right? in point of law? agree? So, You must change the name of Liancourt..to Dokdo..Japan agree that Dokdo is Korean territory.. Just Japan claim that Korea occupied Dokdo illegal..Japan know Dokdo is Korean territory, too.. So It must change the name "Liancourt" -> "Dokdo" !! Jangg8962 (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Please.. Can you cancel to block? please .. I am wrong... I will not do again ..please forgive me..... Jangg8962 (talk) 15:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Please read and follow the instructions on how to appeal that appear above. Based on your subsequent comments I will recommend against an unblock and suggest you wait until your block expires. However if you agree to a six month topic ban from anything to do with Liancourt Rocks then I will lift the block. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 15:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay..i will..please........... Jangg8962 (talk) 15:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I've lifted the block. Understand you may not edit or discuss Liancourt Rocks or related subjects anywhere on Wikipedia for the next six months. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 16:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating your topic ban imposed by NeilN on 4 March, on the page Talk:Liancourt Rocks, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC) <p style="line-height: 90%;"> Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."


 * hey.. what the.. its just a opinion Jangg8962 (talk) 07:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Read what the other administrator told you above: "you may not edit or discuss Liancourt Rocks or related subjects anywhere on Wikipedia ". What about that do you not understand? Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)


 * So i cant say anything about Dokdo to the death????? These days, Wiki occupation period.. Isn't it?? looooooooooool..( Wiki occupation...That's sick..)Jangg8962 (talk) 15:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)