User talk:휘뚜루마뚜루

Super-Junior-stub
Hi - a stub template, category, or redirect which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  00:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of MSX Colors
A tag has been placed on MSX Colors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. ukexpat (talk) 01:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of MSX Colors
A tag has been placed on MSX Colors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 01:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Boys Love-stub and MSX-stub
Hi - two stub templates, categories, or redirects which you created have been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub types, which were not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, do not meet the standard requirements for stub types, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type. This is not the first time that unp[roposed stub types which you have created have been listed in this way. Please, in future, PROPOSE new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  00:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Your bot request
Hi 휘뚜루마뚜루, I wanted to let you know that Bots/Requests for approval/WhiBot is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! SoxBot IX (talk) 03:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

슈주 팬사이트가 어떻게 백과사전이 됩니까?
"Encyclopedic" is not equivalent to encyclopedia. I know you on Korean Wikpedia, so please refrain yourself here. I would not condone any disruptive edits. 팬질은 그 팬사이트에서 하고, 여기서 멈추세요.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 수록된 문서의 내용은 읽어 보고 쓰는 것입니까? 내용부터가 백과사전의 형식인데 백과사전이 못 된다는 것은 이해할 수 없습니다. --  MISA  ☆ Amane  12:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 그렇게 따지면, 퀄리티를 보아서 슈주 팬사이트보다 훨 나아서, 수록될 "백과사전같은" 팬사이트가 너무 많네요. 아이돌 사이트를 여기다 올리면서, 홍보를 높이려는 것은 WP:Spam에 해당됩니다. 위키백과의 정책을 이해할 수 없으면, 님의 뜻이 맞는 백괴사전 같은 장소에서 편집을 하시면 되겠습니다.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * http://campaigns.wikia.com/wiki/Campaigns_Wikia

What on earth this website becoming an encycloepdia to be listed on the article. It is about how to campaign for their political agendas. 지금 장난하는 겁니까?!!!--Caspian blue (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 백과사전으로 알고 있었는데? 아닙니까? --  MISA  ☆ Amane  12:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 그렇게 따지면, 위키트래블도 백과사전이겠군요.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 아 그렇군요. 한국어판 캠페인위키아의 형식이 위키백과와 거의 흡사해서 착각했는데... --  MISA  ☆ Amane  12:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Conflict of interest notification
I am concerned that some of your edits at the English Wikipedia may not follow our conflict of interest guideline. Please review, and follow, that guideline. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

==Notability of Surub Junior== A tag has been placed on Surub Junior requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:File Tree
Template:File Tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Listing of Template:MSX color at templates for discussion
Template:MSX color has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Listing of Template:MSX2 color at templates for discussion
Template:MSX2 color has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Burning Heat


The article Burning Heat has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "no significant coverage"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TarkusAB talk / contrib 21:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)