User talk:-A-M-B-1996-

Interesting!
This is so interesting. I had no idea! Thanks for adding it. Marquardtika (talk) 02:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Democratic-only elections
Sure, the early-to-mid-20th-century South Carolina U.S. Senate elections were just foregone conclusions, based on the Democratic primaries, but I think the infoboxes for the primaries should be kept in that section. —GoldRingChip 21:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * @GoldRingChip: That doesn't make any sense to me whatsoever. Why not put the infobox for all elections in the "results" section then? Because the purpose of an infobox is to briefly tell the story of the election; those infoboxes do that. Keep them in the introduction to summarize the article. -A-M-B-1996- (talk) 21:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Because then shouldn't we use an infobox for the general? —GoldRingChip 01:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * @GoldRingChip: No, because a 99%–1% uncompetitive landslide or unopposed race doesn't "tell the story of the election." –-A-M-B-1996- (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That's a good point. Then go ahead and change them back. —GoldRingChip 01:12, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Harry Harper
Thank you for starting on the expansion of Harry Harper last week. I had that article on my watchlist and finished getting the article to a five-fold expansion. I've nominated the article for WP:DYK. See the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Harper and propose any hook changes that you like. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Lloyd George
Re: this edit. Lloyd George was NOT admitted to the bar. He was a solicitor not a barrister. DuncanHill (talk) 01:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Apologies and thank you for the correction. An Americanism slipping in, I'm afraid. -A-M-B-1996- (talk) 01:35, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem. DuncanHill (talk) 01:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Good work
Seeing that you made convention maps for the republican primary articles, and I just want to say that that's a great addition. Keep up the good work. GeorgeBailey (talk) 23:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much! I'm hopeful that they (and the Democratic equivalents) can provide more comprehensive stories of the nomination process before the McGovern reforms. -A-M-B-1996- (talk) 01:39, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on 1986 Arizona gubernatorial election
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1986 Arizona gubernatorial election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20%26%2345;A-M-B-1996-&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1209041116 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1986_Arizona_gubernatorial_election&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1209041116%7C1986%20Arizona%20gubernatorial%20election%5D%5D Ask for help])

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Alben W. Barkley into 1926 United States Senate election in Kentucky. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

OurCampaigns
Hi. I appreciate your work creating and expanding election articles, but please don't rely on OurCampaigns. OurCampaigns is a wiki and not considered a reliable source. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 19:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

FAR for 1880 Republican National Convention
I have nominated 1880 Republican National Convention for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 18:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * 1783 New York gubernatorial election
 * added a link pointing to George Clinton
 * 1789 New York gubernatorial election
 * added a link pointing to George Clinton

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)