User talk:00666

Plan Avila
Please explain at Talk:Plan Ávila why you are deleting references. Thanks, Sandy 22:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Iraq War
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. HawkerTyphoon 21:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Corporate Average Fuel Economy
If you want to argue the Heritage Foundation is full of baloney, fine. Just do it in the talk page, not by deleting references and making non-sense edits. --Silja 02:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Content removal
It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from List of massacres committed during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 06:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Bill Clinton. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sagaciousuk (talk) 22:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Re: Email. In future, please leave messages on user talk pages rather than send them emails reguarding edit matters.
 * I have taken the time to re-review the edits in question which I reverted. Your first edit removed source links - with no justification or reasoning. Sources are important on Wikipedia, mainly for keeping the content of a page backed-up by other evidence. Your second edit just added a list of supposed 'facts' about the sensitive issue of terrorism. Whilst I appreciate you may have felt these 'facts' to be useful - the style they were written in and the sheer nature of them - made them seemingly inappropriate for the article. And your third edit changed some years - again with no justification or anything to support their change. I am sorry if you felt my revertion was harsh or unreasonable - but when reviewing the edits they were deemed inappropriate. Feel free to discuss new content for the article on its talk page - Talk:Bill Clinton, where other Wikipedians will be able to offer their opinions in future. --Sagaciousuk (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)