User talk:0132Dats

February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Vincent appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 14:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel (name). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 22:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't believe this is vandalism, I have a friend called Samuel and I am only writing the truth. You cannot prove that I am wrong.

Neutral point of view
Please keep in mind that maintaining a neutral point of view is a core policy of Wikipedia. Editors should not be adding their personal opinions to articles. I have reverted several such additions you have made to various Penguins players for this reason. Thank you, Resolute 13:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Once again, Wikipedia is not the place for you to share your personal viewpoints on hockey players. If you wish to do that, I suggest joining a hockey forum or starting a blog. Resolute 16:44, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: Neutral point of view
I have cited at least one source to back up the facts I added to the players. Adding their strengths does not reflect my opinion of the players, it is a fact. The players are recognised worldwide. I believe that you are still mad of what Matt Cooke did to the E Karlsson, if I edited players of the Senators and added their strengths, you won't revert it for sure. Forget the past and walk on don't cry over spilled milk
 * That is a pretty stupid argument given I am not a Senators fan, nor do I care about the Cooke/Karlsson incident (which was nothing more than an accident). I do care about maintaining the neutrality of Wikipedia. And given that, I will continue to revert your POV and unsourced additions, even if you register other accounts to try and push this. Resolute 13:46, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel (name), you may be blocked from editing. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 03:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Re; Apparition December 2013
What if my name is really Samuel? Are you ignoring my existence? Are you discriminating me?
 * Wikipedia discriminates based on WP:NOTABILITY. Existing is not a reason to be listed, notability is. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 04:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

March 2014
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to John Maynard Keynes, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 04:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Julian Green. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Haters gonna hate. If I edited your favourite soccer team, you will be more than happy.