User talk:01casas

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dred Scott v. Sandford, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dred Scott v. Sandford was changed by 01casas (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876192 on 2010-12-08T21:19:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Dred Scott v. Sandford constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ” TeLeS ( T @ L C S) 21:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dred Scott v. Sandford. ” TeLeS ( T @ L C S) 21:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)