User talk:03md/archive1

FA Cup
Thank you for adding an explanation about the venue choice for FA Cup matches. --ClaudioMB (talk) 19:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:American Claimant.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:American Claimant.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Davis Cup
No problem, I understood your point about Federer playing for the Davis Cup for the first time in months, but it was the use of "surprinsingly" which I thought carried POV, and I also believe that Federer's return was not the only factor of the Swiss' success in the Play-offs (the rise of Wawrinka as a top ten player, and the success in doubles of the Federer/Wawrinka team at the Olympics was also important). --Oxford St. (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I have seen your call for the creation of individual Masters Series articles on the Tennis WikiProject discussion page - I am currently working on creating individual articles for other tournaments (Rotterdam, Long Island, and the various men's year-end championships), so I'm quite busy right now, but I fully intend to participate to the creation of Masters Series events. I think the first aim should be to do with each event what was done with the Canada Masters, that is create articles back to 2000, when the Super 9 officially became the Tennis Masters Series. For my part, I'm probably going to start working on the Paris event soon. --Oxford St. (talk) 15:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think for consistency you should pick an event. Let me know when you make your choice. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Indianapolis Tennis Championships
I saw your message saying you would work on the Indy event, and I did some research, to discover it only started to be called Indianapolis Tennis Championships in 2007. It bore four other names before that, mainly RCA Championships - I corrected the tournament's template using these names, as well as the main TennisEventInfo-TennisEvents2 templates, and moved the pages you created as well as the '94 and '95 ones that already existed to their correct location.

I have also removed the links of the dates (against MOS), and corrected some categories. Also, I tagged the articles in the talk pages (as you may know, User:rst20xx tagged all tournament articles recently, and asked me and some other editors to tag all new articles we might create). One last thing - I haven't corrected that, but scores should actually be written with Ndashes, instead of regular hyphens (that's – instead of -).

Anyway - good luck with the rest your work. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bradley James (born 1984)
A tag has been placed on Bradley James (born 1984) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Tennis
OK, there is a number of small changes that I probably would do to the 2000 RCA Championships pages if I were to copyedit them - perhaps some of these changes are not that important but here we go :

On the main 2000 RCA Championships page:


 * The current lead to present the players is fine, but I usually write them under a different format : First a sentence about the top 3 players (The singles field/draw/line up featured/was headlined by/was led by/included etc... Player 1, Player 2, and Player 3) in which I usually mention the ranking of the top seed (you can see that in the Player Activity section on the players profiles of the ATP website - here Kuerten was ATP No. 2 when arriving in Indianapolis) to give an idea of the importance of the tournament (it makes a big difference if the top seed is World No. 1 of ATP No. 34). In that first sentence, I usually mention all the titles won by the top three seeds, and eventually finals, perhaps semifinals, in Grand Slam events. In the second sentence, I mention the titles, or Grand Slam performances, of the fourth and fifth seeds, and just the names of three other players (Also present/competing/lined up etc... were Wimbledon runner-up, Long Island titlist Player 4, Hamburg winner Player 5, Player 6, Player 7 and Player 8). I try to always keep that little preview section on three lines (font on my computer is on small - the preview generally ends up on four lines with a normal font). (Anyway, there must be a thousand good ways to write these previews, but that's how I do)
 * More importantly, you should have PDF versions of the draws in the external links section - when they're not available on the ATP website, get them on the ITF website (Go in the 'Drawsheet' section here, and use the URLs of the Printable versions). When tie-breaks scores are not present in the ITF draws, I sometimes use this website, and put a link to the draw in question in article (like here, with that Singles Scores (with tie-breaks)  link).
 * Also important, you should create the red links categories, like the Category:2000 RCA Championships here.

On the singles 2000 RCA Championships - Singles page:


 * When the defending champion loses in the final, I usually write Player 1 was the defending champion, but Player 2 defeated him/her 6–0, 7–6(4), in the final.
 * The score in the navbox needs to be ndashed.
 * You need to have PDF links to the draw and the qualifying draw.
 * The category needs to be created.
 * You must create the talk page to tag the article.
 * As for the use of byes - it is actually very simple: you just need to remove in the code the matches that do not take place, see for example the code of this article - the 1st first round match is not seed01 vs. seed02, but seed03 vs. seed04, and the 4th first round match is not seed09 vs. seed10, but seed11 vs. seed12.
 * Finally, one last recommendation would be to check, double check again and again the scores, to avoid errors. The draws of the ATP/ITF, and even the website I gave a link to earlier are not always right. I generally compare the scores of several sources: the ITF PDF draw, the results on the ITF website, the ATP website draw, the stevegtennis.com draws, and the scores in the Player Activity of players profiles on the ATP website.

There is your review. Once again, let me stress the fact that there is probably a thousand ways to write these articles, and this is nothing else but my own way to do it - even though I applied it to standardize many, many, many articles.

I hope I didn't sound too picky. Let me know if you have other questions. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 13:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I've made the last few changes necessary in my view to the 2000 RCA Championships main page - other than these changes, the page seems perfectly fine to me. I'm going to look at the individual draw pages soon. --Oxford St. (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I've made the changes necessary to the 2000 RCA Championships - Singles page (changed the links, corrected some scores, names, and flags, used an 8-team-bracket for the finals section (we use that for the 64 or 56 players draws), added half the seeds which were missing, and some other little things). I also modified the 2000 RCA Championships category - you don't have to actually write something when creating a category, as there is always an automated text created, however, you need to put subcategories to allow navigation (here I've just added the ATP Tour cat), and also create a talk page in which you tag the cats (once again by request of User:Rst20xx). I'll look at the doubles page when it is finished. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * One other thing - when seeded players do not complete their matches, or withdraw before their matches, we write withdrew due to or retired due to next to the round in which they lost, and add the reason. Here I googled articles about the tournament to find out why Rios and Novak retired and withdrew, but the reasons are sometimes metioned on ATP pdf draws. The same thing is done for doubles seeds, mentioning the family name of the injured player (withdrew/retired due to a groin injury for Woodforde). --Oxford St. (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: 2008 County Championship
I could probably do a small summary for 2008 English cricket season, but honestly I didn't see too much of this season so I doubt I could do anything particularly in depth for the individual articles. I'll see what I can rustle up later tonight, though :) Regards, AllynJ (talk | contribs) 21:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Howzat? It's a start at least. If you wanna tidy it up or anything that'd be great. :) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 02:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

That looks good. I will see if I can add anything more myself. Good work on the stats on the County Championship page as well. 03md (talk) 08:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Masters Series/Super 9
The template may be quite useful, but the articles prior to 2000, when the ATP coined the term 'Masters Series', should use their official sponsor name. I know that some Masters articles pre-2000 already exist with "Masters" in the title, but they should be moved.

I have actually started searching for the tournaments' official titles for the year 1990, and modified the 1990 Super 9 template;

and the 1994 Super 9 template, as well as all the 1994 Super 9 articles, which I have already moved to their official names:

--Oxford St. (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't be sorry - it's a normal mistake. For your information, the Indian Wells Masters website has a detailed History section in which the men's and women's tournament's past names are listed. The stevegtennis.com website I previously mentioned here, probably has some of these sponsor names, too. --Oxford St. (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I must have some of these names, so I'll try and finish the template tomorrow. Anyway, we should start by doing the "Masters" articles from 2000 to today, and that is already a big job. The pre-2000 Super 9 articles can wait, I believe. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello ! Sorry not to have answered before, but I have been extremely busy for the past weeks (and it is not going to get better) and I did not have enough time to do the necessary job to complete your template. I just did some googling, looked into the info I have, and completed the template, changing some stuff here and there. If you contact me, I may not see the message for some days, so don't expect quick answers. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Strange question - the Stuttgart Masters took place in Stuttgart ! And before in Essen, and before in Stockholm. The several cities in which the 8th Super 9/TMS/AMS event took place are all mentioned in the Madrid Masters article. --Oxford St. (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, sorry about that, I thought your question was strange... The Stuttgart events all took place (at least between 1996 and 2001, when it was a top tier event) at the Schleyerhalle, also known as the Hanns-Martin-Schleyer-Halle. --Oxford St. (talk) 14:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, there are some spellings errors here and there (Bhupathi not Bhupati), and you still don't use ndashes, but it's a good start. I just don't understand why you created the pre-2000 articles for Stuttgart under Stuttgart Masters and not Eurocard Open, or whatever the tournament's name was at that time - also, you can use the sponsor titles in the infoboxes, instead of still having Paris, Monte Carlo or Stuttgart Masters - for the colors to appear, you just have to add the necessary names to Template:TennisEventInfo and Template:TennisEvents2. --Oxford St. (talk) 09:26, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, you have to add a code with the name with which you want a color to appear, and the code of the color, at the end of the existing lists, like this, in the necessary templates. Template:TennisEventInfo corresponds to the infobox on the main page, and there are several templates (Template:TennisEvents, Template:TennisEvents2), which correspond to the navboxes on the draw pages, when the event is mixed, or men/women's only. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 17:49, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I added "German Open" and "Monte Carlo Open" to the Template:TennisEventInfo page. Monte Carlo is working but German Open still shows up as a white background when added to the infoboxes. 03md (talk) 21:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello ! Well, on the German Open/Berlin Open subject, I guess the easiest and most logical thing to do would be to use the actual sponsored names of the event for the WTA tournament when it was using one. According to the article's main page (German Open (tennis)), the event had sponsored names from 1997, but actually, this document (which is not always to be trusted, but is still very valuable) says the WTA German Open started to be sponsored in 2000. So what I would do first is rename the articles from 2000 to 2008 with their sponsored name, rename the main article with the current sponsored name, and then, for the years pre-2000, when both the WTA and ATP had a German Open, simply name the articles [year] ATP German Open (for 1990-1999 articles), [year] Grand Prix German Open (pre-1990 for men), and [year] WTA German Open. I don't know if that is the best solution, but once again, it seems to be the most logical one to me. Cheers ! --Oxford St. (talk) 11:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I have actually started checking the pages - I have worked already a few days ago on the pages for the 2006 Paris Masters and the 2005 edition. I intend to continue, starting with the Paris events, but I am indeed busy with the Masters Cup article, and many other non-wikipedia things. ;) Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 22:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 2000 Majorca Open - Singles
A tag has been placed on 2000 Majorca Open - Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. The Llama! (talk) 12:37, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

More FA/League Cup stuff
Hiya, I've just changed the 1994-95 competition, adding in the results. I'll work through the later seasons over the next few days, and seeing as I'll have finished all the post-war FA Cup competitions once these are done, I'll make a start on those League Cup ones I said I'd do. El Pollo Diablo (Talk) 08:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. – PeeJay 21:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Paul Krugman is not dead
You added this, but see this. rootology ( C )( T ) 22:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It's been a couple of days and while you've been busy creating articles such as Italian economic battles you've still not explained why did what you did to the Paul Krugman article. I don't understand why you replaced the current events template about his Nobel Prize with one announcing his death.  If you thought he had died, why not leave the current events template in place and just add the one for recent deaths?  There's probably a good explanation for all of this, but because it's a WP:BLP I think you need to mention it here. Thanks. 66.167.48.185 (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Cups again
Hiya, I have an excel spreadsheet which is moderately automated so that you can paste in the results direct from the FA website and, with a bit of tweaking here and there, it will create outputs for wikipedia. It takes a little while to get it right, but if there's somewhere I can send you a copy of the spreadsheet, then let me know. El Pollo Diablo (Talk) 09:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I emailed you the spreadsheet with an explanation this morning. El Pollo Diablo (Talk) 13:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, sorry about that - I'm assuming you're using windows, so go to start->programs->accessories and then open Notepad. Alternatively, you can go to start->Run... and type "notepad" (without the quotes) and that should run it. Paste it into there, save the data as a text file, and then you can open that text file in Excel by clicking on the drop-down menu "Files of type" and selecting "All Files". Hope that helps. El Pollo Diablo (Talk) 11:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:2008 Tennis Masters Cup
Thanks - I have adressed a message to User:The Rambling Man on tour, who had proposed his help to create FA and GA in the tennis project, I hope he will help bring this article to FA status. As for the WTA championships - it would certainly be a good idea to do the same thing, but I don't know the WTA tour as well as the ATP one so I don't think I can do it myself, and anyway I really believe we should wait and see how this idea of ATP year-end event as FA turns out here, before spreading the idea to the WTA event, and, eventually, to past ATP and WTA events. --Oxford St. (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

RE:ATP Masters Series/Super 9 Tournaments
Thanks for the request. I'll start working on the draws as soon as possible. Totalinarian (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

2003 Indian Wells Masters
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2003 Indian Wells Masters, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: 2004 Indian Wells Masters. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Miami Masters
Well, I thought it had changed from Lipton International Players Championships in '92 to Lipton Championships in '93 (that's what is written in this official PDF from the WTA website), but then I found this web article from nowhere, which just says the event moved from Lipton's sponsorship to Ericsson's in 1999. Still, if I were you, I'd trust the WTA PDF more, and have Lipton International Players Championships from '90 to '92 and Lipton Championships afterwards. If you intend to change the Miami Masters article, you should include the WTA PDF as a ref, to prove the name change. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 20:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Templates
If you intend to continue creating the ATP Tour/WTA Tour yearly templates, please do the job from A to Z, by creating talk pages with the correct templates, by double-checking the spellings and the links and the tournaments' correct names. You should also use What links here and replace the existing template with the new one (I know redirecting the old links to the new template allow it to be transcluded instead of the old ones, but we should avoid having too many redirects, and anyway, that pracice sometimes creates technical problems). This is something I have done yesterday for the 2006 and 2005 ATP templates, but I don't have the time to do this for all of them. --Oxford St. (talk) 11:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Arsenal F.C. Reserves seasons
An article that you have been involved in editing, Arsenal F.C. Reserves seasons, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Arsenal F.C. Reserves seasons. Thank you. – PeeJay 11:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Masters Series draws
Apologies, I took a brief hiatus from doing those. Will recommence writing up the draws ASAP. Totalinarian (talk) 17:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Problems with upload of Image:MIllwall_FC_old_crest.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MIllwall_FC_old_crest.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Brasil Open
Well, I don't have any particular information about it, so I can't say if it is exactly the same event for sure, but it looks like it is. The first WTA Brasil Open was held in 2000, and the tournament moved in 2001 to Bahia, precisely at the same location of the 2001-created ATP Brasil Open. The tournaments' dates, also, show the men's events were held one week after the women's, so I guess that, yes, it was some kind of joint, combined event during the three years of existence of the WTA event - much like the Canada Masters, which takes place with the men, then with the women playing, or next year's Swedish Open, which will take place first on the WTA tour, then on the ATP World Tour. Good find, I think you can add the women's results to the Brasil Open page ! Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 20:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't know if you're aware of it, but there's a very pratictal tool on the ITF website (at this link) which allows to search in their tournaments database by region, nation, surface, name, etc... If you enter the widest field of search in the dates (say, early 1968 until now), and look for tournaments in Brazil, you'll see all the events which took place there, Grand Prix, ATP Tour, even some WCT tournaments (not all of them), and Challengers. Apparently for 1991, there were two tourneys in Guaruja, one in Brasilia, one in Buzios, one in Sao Paulo. Almost all of these have articles on wikipedia (which I've found using the "Category:Tennis tournaments in Brazil"); ATP Guarujá (which corresponds to Guaruja I - I have no clue why it was played twice in 1991, and if Guaruja II was a second edition of that one, or a completely different tournament, held only that year), Brasilia Open, ATP Buzios. It looks like the Sao Paulo event doesn't have an article. Hope it helped you. Cheers, --Oxford St. (talk) 12:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, I've made some research and it is not simple. Guaraja I, won by Patrick Baur, is the same Guaraja as in 1990, and is known as the Chevrolet Classic. Now, searching for Guaraja II, I found articles speaking of Javier Frana's win over Markus Zoecke, at the Philips Open,... but in Sao Paulo ! Yet, the real Sao Paulo event, won by Miniussi was a different event, the Banespa Open. So, for the templates and pages, use 1991 Chevrolet Classic for Guaraja I, 1991 Philips Open for Guaraja II, and 1991 Banespa Open for Sao Paulo. Now I still don't understand why newspapers say the Philips Open was in Sao Paulo while the ATP website (and the ITF) say it was in Guaraja, but here is all the information I've got (perhaps we should send a question to the ATP website, and hope for an (unlikely) answer...) Cheers ! --Oxford St. (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Tier II template
I've added the dates for all the tournaments...I have to admit, I didn't have a very sophisticated method of finding these out: I went to the French Wikipedia articles, and the tables on there all contain information on what Tier the event was in what year. I checked most of them against the player activity (WTA site) of players who I knew had the played the events. Otherwise, it's difficult. Should the events be ordered by what year they were first classed as a Tier II? Yohan euan o4 (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I think the templates should begin with the ones starting in 1988 and then progress forwards, with those only gaining their status in 2008 at the end. 03md (talk) 20:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll try to add the other events, to the templates for the other Tiers, in the next few days. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 11:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yep, I've added the years and tiers for all tournaments that were still being played as of 2008; and then a few more. I'll try and get most of the defunct tournaments done soon. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 19:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I would rather have the Barcelona Ladies Open be about the reoccuring tennis event played in Barcelona (1972, 1974, 1976, 1978, 1985-95, 2007-08 i.e. WTA Barcelona) than have separate articles for all of these. It's essentially the same thing going on, and any differences that took place between the years of the event being held could be explained in the article. As for the Madrid Open (1996-2003)...that should probably be split into its own article, as it seems to be a different event that replaced Barcelona. It could even be added to the Madrid Masters article, as that's where I expect the information for the new Madrid Open will go, with it being a combined event. I'll look into it. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 13:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll input past results for the Barcelona Ladies Open soon, and create a Madrid Open article. As for the history of which tournaments were tiered at what level and when...I'm struggling, but I think I've found a way. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 18:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I haven't found all of them, as I can't find any sites (not even WTA) that have collected the data in the manner that we are trying to do. One method could be to look at the French Wikipedia's WTA Tour pages (they have them going back to 1988), as it shows what events were which tier and when. The official Tour pages could be used as well but they are difficult to navigate (the older ones) and the Tiering isn't always obvious. Cheers, Yohan euan o4 (talk) 15:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I've added the older Shanghai event for now and will have a look for some more. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 14:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

No content in Category:1996 Stuttgart Masters
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:1996 Stuttgart Masters, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:1996 Stuttgart Masters has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:1996 Stuttgart Masters, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Reply to tennis summary
Yes, I would be interested in doing the summaries (I have already contributed to day by day summaries for the four grand slams the past two years) for all 2009 events. GAThrawnIGF (talk)


 * Well, I'm American, so I can't update the summary for the entire day's play of ASB Classic & Brisbane International until the next morning. I can do Qatar ExxonMobil Open & Chennai Open the same night as the matches, though. GAThrawnIGF (talk) 19:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Will be difficult for me since I'm particularly poor at finding references. Apologies.Garethz (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC).


 * I won't be able to do these summaries, I'm in bed by the time everything finishes. Apologies. GAThrawnIGF (talk) 01:10, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Sports in 2009
The single digit representing a date in January; do you really prefer it? I think it's much better as it was. Tony  (talk)  15:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Premier League seasons
I think that a simple overview of the season would be more appropriate than reviews from each team's point of view. This should definitely not be in timeline form, however. If you have any of the Premier League season review DVDs (such as these) they might give you a good idea about how to write a season review. Same goes for any episodes of The Premiership Years on Sky Sports. Very useful programmes those. Stats are also important for Premier League seasons articles, if you can find sources for them. – PeeJay 19:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you able to help me with some of the articles because I will do some of them - I was just about to suggest the Premier League Years programmes and then noticed that you had put that down. 03md (talk) 19:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I really don't have the time to do anything like that at the minute. Not only do I have my own Wikipedia projects on the go, but I also have an exam on Thursday that I really should be revising for. – PeeJay 21:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If I was you, I'd post a notice on WT:FOOTY. – PeeJay 22:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll chip in. Do you want to start at each end and meet in the middle, or work together on the same article?  I suppose we should also work out some form of MoS for the articles.  In my opinion, grids of results have to go, as do individual teams' "seasons reviews" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm just wary of the grids falling afoul of WP:NOTSTATS, or whatever the policy is on not having tons of stats in. But I guess the general consensus would come out if we took one to PR.  If you like, I'll start with 92-93 and see how I get on, then we can compare notes :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I haven't got Sky Sports :-P -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure where you can find free images, but they have to be released under a certain licence for us to use them on Wikipedia. It seems like what you did for the Team of the Year image is take copyrighted images and composite them into a team lineup. While this shows good ingenuity, this is known as a derivative work, which you cannot claim as your own as you did not create the original photos. – PeeJay 20:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Collaborative number ones
It doesn't really apply to the 1990s, as there were hardly any "X featuring Y" numbers ones. I did credit both George Michael and Elton John with one each for their duet, likewise George Michael and Queen for their collaboration. I'd say if the artist got label credit then count that as one number one for him/her -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Martin Matcham
I have nominated Martin Matcham, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Martin Matcham. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Pyrrhus16 (talk) 12:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

2006 Miami Masters
Hello. I thought that was unusual myself, but decided to go with the name on the article. My apologies - I have just seen it and will move the page accordingly --Totalinarian (talk) 18:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Brasil Open
It is hard to say if any of the tournaments you mentioned (e.g. Sao Paulo) double up as the Brasil Open pre-1994. A consult of the tournament profile for the current Brasil Open (shown here) shows no records beyond that year, and none of the Brazilian tournaments prior to 1994 seem to have a historical link to Costa do Sauipe. At a guess, Sao Paulo looks like the closest possiblity given that that tournament finished in 1993, but it looks as though the other Brazilian tournaments are completely separate tournaments from the Brasil Open. Thanks for the query. --Totalinarian (talk) 14:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

South African Open
Following the move of the South African Open to South African Open (golf), several WP:Double redirects were created. Please remember to fix these, and also correct all links to disambiguation pages next time you move a page. Thanks. bigissue (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: ATP World Tour table colours
Hi, it seems like the person who was with me in the discussion got blocked for some reason, the colors you have chosen are good to me, I prefer those strong lights, but yet again some users say it doesn't make the flag colors look good, would be great of you to continue the discussion over there on the article's discussion page to see what everyone thinks and I will surely participate, thanks. Yosef1987 (talk) 11:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Croatian Tournaments
I believe they are the same, because when you click on the draw for Split, and then change the web address from 1998 to 1997, it loads up Zagreb. GAThrawnIGF (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)