User talk:04mckennaaa1

Speedy deletion of Matt Spargo
A tag has been placed on Matt Spargo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Menti  sock  12:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Attacks in
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 12:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wessex Boys
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wessex Boys, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. McGeddon (talk) 12:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Wessexboys.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Wessexboys.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wessex Boys
A tag has been placed on Wessex Boys, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Whispe ring  17:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Marasmusine (talk) 10:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Orangemike
Hi

I reverted your edit to User:Orangemike; it's generally better to place comments on editors' talk pages.

Cheers, This flag once was red   10:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Cricket
Your "Wessex Boys" article failed this guideline, if that's what you're talking about. It was an extremely short article that didn't "indicate why its subject is important or significant" - I don't even remember it mentioning that it was a cricket team, it just mentioned being in a particular division and gave a list of names.

If your team's been in the papers, or has won any significant tournaments, that should be mentioned in the article, and might be enough to meet the above guideline. Local sports teams generally have to have done something pretty significant to merit a full encyclopaedia article, though. --McGeddon (talk) 10:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Attacks in
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. --McGeddon (talk) 10:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)