User talk:0oToddo0

Please stop
Please cease replacing the unbalanced tag at the article "Two by Twos". Two editors have reverted you more than once, and I don't think either of us want to go to firmer measures. Edit warring isn't a good idea. Please discuss on the talk page further. Thank you. Winkelvi (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Reporting renewed edit warring on Two by Twos
You have decided to engage again in behavior for which you have previously been reprimanded. This backdoor effort to insert your personal synthesis and deface the article using tags is being reported to WP:AN/EW. 5 instances again in less than 24 hours. &bull; Astynax talk 23:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The report is now reported here. &bull; Astynax talk 00:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Because there is 8 hours without reverts, I am not going to block you. But if you re-add that tag again, in opposition to the apparent consensus, I will block you for edit warring immediately. Viridae DON'T PANIC  08:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * What is the purpose of tags if they are not allowed to be used? Have a read of the wording on the tag and you will see that it is quite appropriate that the tag is placed there, based on the neglected viewpoints that I mentioned.  By the way, I am not the only one edit warring,because as much as I have added the tag, others have removed it.  How about we spend more of our correspondence on how to fix the article so that we can legitimately remove the tag.  Yes, I know this article raises some passionate debate by those who want to support a particular point of view, of which some the points I raise tends to contradict, but if we have to suppress some of these facts because of a particular point of view, that makes this article unbalanced.  If an article is unbalanced, it needs an unbalanced tag to alert readers to the fact that they may be only get part of the story. 0oToddo0 (talk) 08:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your latest reversions have been reported again
Here. &bull; Astynax talk 15:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring at Two by Twos
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Two by Twos. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 01:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)