User talk:0xtomato/YIMBY movement

Peer Review 2
A.1. "In Auckland, New Zealand, the introduction of upzoning led to a stimulation of the housing construction industry and an increase in the city’s supply of housing."

A.2. "YIMBYs argue cities can be made increasingly affordable and accessible by building more infill housing, and that greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced by denser cities." I don't really know to be honest.

B.1. "Urban development with higher density levels and fewer restrictions on land use reduces the population’s need to travel by automobile, and thus, cities’ need to develop car-based infrastructure, which in the United States accounts for 29% of all greenhouse gas emissions." I don't really think this is a struggle, but to avoid close paraphrasing I guess you can always try to find different verbs and adjectives?

C.1. "A more recent study on the subject of housing elasticity found an opposite conclusion; while newly constructed housing was often purchased at higher prices, the increase in supply at the high end of the market drove down prices everywhere else, leading to material benefits for people across all income groups."

C.2. None

C.3. None

D.1. Existing Article - I think the smaller additions and addition of key gaps is effective and helps the article feel more complete and recent. I don't have any suggestions for improving your contributions.

E.1. Your greatest strength is maintaining a neutral tone in your contributions to the article.

E.2. I think including citations and references in your sandbox could help you get familiar with how the citing in Wikipedia works, assuming you haven't tried adding them in yet with the sources you have for your contributions. I think you would have less chance of experiencing difficulty citing and editing citations when publishing at the end.

E.3. None AlexVonGod (talk) 07:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)