User talk:0zerothree3

Speedy deletion of Reverand Arthur Murray
A tag has been placed on Reverand Arthur Murray requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement [of http://www.online-bibleconcordance.com/Ministers/ArnoldMurray.aspx]. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note that we have deleted articles about Arnold Murray before; see Articles for deletion/Arnold Murray and Articles for deletion/Arnold Murray (2nd nomination). Thus, another article about him should not be created unless (1) it can be written based on reliable sources, and (2) it is approved at Deletion review. If this article is re-created, it should be titled Arnold Murray, noting the correction of his first name and the fact that his title of "Reverend" should not be included in the article title. See WP:NCP. (The copyright issue mentioned above is not a major concern because the referenced site apparently copied an old version of Arnold Murray when it was an article on Wikipedia; however, that article was later deemed to be not good enough for Wikipedia in those Articles for deletion discussions.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)