User talk:1.129.106.68

October 2017
Hello, I'm Gaelan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mouthwash— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (talk to) Gaelan('s contributions) 03:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

August 2019
Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''' CLCStudent (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk &bull; contributions) 17:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request
P.S. Not part of the unblock request, but it would be nice if the unblock template didn't get 'corrupted' if internal WP links were included as part of the "reason". Also, the original unblock request was formatted with a numbered list in my submission, but got corrupted somehow to 'bare' hash symbols (#). Maybe the line-returns were stripped out after I submitted it. It's not the biggest problem in the world, but it does make the "reason" hard to read now. —DIV (1.129.106.68 (talk) 02:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC))

Someone else will review this, but you said "What this assessment seems to be saying is that, for example, one single act of vandalism on a shared IP could be responded to with a block of millions of IP addresses for many months"(my emphasis). I was making it clear that your example is incorrect in this case. You are also still arguing process and not the merits, which is an indicator you are the target. 331dot (talk) 09:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to EndNote has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: EndNote was changed by 1.129.106.68 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87114 on 2020-10-14T03:13:40+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at EndNote. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 2601:200:E:F73F:916:F929:535F:84C5 (talk) 03:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 1990—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)