User talk:1.136.107.10

September 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at CNN controversies. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 09:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have said the sources are poor and the writing is not neutral. Please provide proof. --1.136.107.10 (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

CNN controversies
As you no doubt noticed when editing the article, CNN controversies is under the one revert rule, which you have now violated. Please self revert and start a discussion on the article's talk page. The burden is on you to gain consensus for the changes you want to make. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)