User talk:1.145.19.122

May 2021
Your edits on Zac Cini were reverted because it doesn't need that many links. GameEnd (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Zac Cini. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:44, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2023: unblock2 — please actually consider it properly this time
I'm not reviewing this; I unblock users when needed(feel free to examine my stats on my user page, or my edit history for "unblock accepted"). A link to the contributions of the range is given. I did indeed misread the log, I apologize. You are, however, arguing process and not the merits of the block itself. If you weren't disruptively editing, then say so- in which case you will be advised to create an account so your edits aren't lumped in with others. If you disagree with how blocks like this are handled, you can discuss your concerns once you obtain editing access one way or the other; I suspect that you aren't new at this. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

More problems with IP range block implementation
P.S. There's another frustrating (stupid) issue about range blocks:  it's recognised that with shared, dynamically allocated IP addresses, editors will progressively move between IP addresses within a range, according to whatever is 'automatically' assigned to them. But the block only allows them to edit the Talk page for one single IP address, rather than the Talk pages for all IP addresses within the range. The latter would make more sense, and allow the IP editor to follow up on an Unblock Request at a later date, at which time they've been assigned a new Ip address. —DIV (49.179.9.115 (talk) 12:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC))