User talk:1.244.36.71

May 2023
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Hugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of Westminster, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of Westminster, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 06:31, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Hàlian. I noticed that you recently removed content from Hugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of Westminster without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Furthermore, a request for page protection has been made. Thank you.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of Westminster. Equine-man (talk) 07:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of Westminster, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. HeartCat1 🏳‍🌈 💬📝 23:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Meghan Gallacher, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Apologies: I meant Hugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of Westminster JohnLaurensAnthonyRamos333 (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Hugh Grosvenor, 7th Duke of Westminster shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jamedeus (talk) 07:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)