User talk:1.43.54.193

December 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Magdalen Berns, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. gnu 57 14:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Magdalen Berns, you may be blocked from editing. This warning results from edit 1 and edit 2 made by you on 22 December 2019. As evidenced by the preceding message, it is the second warning you have received regarding your edits of the biographical article. Pyxis Solitary  (yak). L not Q. 10:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Advice
Hi there.

I see that you don't like Magdalen Berns, which I can definitely understand, but I'd like to offer you some advice.

Please consider that she is dead. Nothing you write makes any difference to her but there is a possibility that it could be seen by somebody in her family and that this it might upset them. We have no reason to believe that her family shared her extreme beliefs and, even then, there is nothing to be gained by upsetting them. Consider that continued activity on her article only serves to keep the bickering about her alive, to make it look like there is a debate (or, gods forbid, a "legacy") here when there isn't. It gives TERFs another thing to get angry about and play the victim over. They love doing that, so let's not give them another opportunity.

It probably makes you angry too, and there is no point in getting angry about something that you can't change, particularly when there are so many other things that you can change. If you want to stay on Wikipedia then why not consider contributing constructively to some other articles? That said, we don't want non-neutral polemic on any of our articles so, if that really is your thing, then you will need to find another forum for that.

Above all, please consider that when you disrupt Wikipedia the thing you are disrupting is Wikipedia itself. Wikipedia is part of an educational charitable foundation that seeks to give the world a free encyclopaedia, for everybody and by everybody, particularly including people who would not be able to participate in a more conventional encyclopaedia due to lack of money or access. That is the opposite of being an "anything exclusionary anything". So, please, for the good of Wikipedia and everybody else, just let Berns slide even deeper into obscurity and let Wikipedia get on with its mission. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Regards, --DanielRigal (talk) 12:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

making fun of people on their wikipedia page harms literally nobody, get your hand off it lol


 * Wrong! it is vandalising Wikipedia. It harms the project. You need to stop. I've tried to explain why. If you don't listen then you will probably get blocked from editing. Please don't do that, particularly not over such a minor figure like Berns. It's really not worth it. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)