User talk:1.43.90.252

Fred Parslow
A filmography doesn't need to be in a table: see WP:FILMOGRAPHY, "Some filmographies are presented in a tabled format; however, you should make sure there is an obvious benefit to table format before creating a table for a filmography (e.g. a relatively short listing of credits for newer actors are better presented in list form, not table form)." I don't see any reason, in this case, for the cumbersome formatting of a table, and let's note that your version had serious errors. I'm not blaming you for that, but the fact that it's easy to mess up a table and thereby, as in this case, mess up the article, is a serious consideration. Drmies (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC) Yes, some filmography's are written in a a list and others are presented in a tabulated form, personally it doesen't matter as long as the information is here, primarily it is a generally a preference of how one wants to present the data, a think a table is more neat and in this case the article relating to actor Fred Parslow is not concise, I write an article mainly like this This way all the information is made available, the title of the production, the year of release, the role or the name of the character, any relevant notes and a full reference or citation. I like to in particular add the name of the character, which is sometime not represented in list form.