User talk:100% LEGIT HISTORIAN

Hello, I'm Saturnoswald. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Saturnoswald (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

100% LEGIT HISTORIAN, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:100% LEGIT HISTORIAN/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:100%25_LEGIT_HISTORIAN/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kethrus&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:100%25_LEGIT_HISTORIAN/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Kethrus &#124;talk to me 21:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:100% LEGIT HISTORIAN/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:100%25_LEGIT_HISTORIAN/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:100%25_LEGIT_HISTORIAN/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 03:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

I HAVE HAD ENOUGH
Listen up "wikipedia", you clearly and thankfully understand that I was trying to be funny, and yes it was disappointing to be declined. But you ticked me off when you said you only allow "factual information" on your website. Now I'm pissed off because there is SO much false sh*t on wiki and YOU know it. Out of all the people that but 100% fake bulls*t on your site, you decline the person that wants to have fun, not the REAL false informers-no, it has to be someone that wants to have fun. I made my article as a joke, obvious enough to where nobody would be stupid enough to know its real. Thus is intentional, and of course people know its FAKE! THATS THE POINT. But there are other people out there that TRY to misinform people about the truth, obscuring it. You clearly are not good at your job, because any 2 year old would know that what I said was fake, but you clearly think, that if an article is long enough, its legit. Do you know why? Because you don't think anyone is creative enough to falsify a decent amount of "information". So get good at your job and make sure people actually seeking REAL information don't come across those who make the false information believable. ~And you can't mark this down for being false information or me being humorous. This is 100% LEGIT.