User talk:100.12.216.122

December 2019
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, China–Norway relations, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 06:50, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at China–Norway relations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Edison Lin27 (Message Me! • &#128220; ) 08:24, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Regarding Pokémon: The First Movie
In response to your message on my talk page - I agree that the other links didn't belong there, so I've removed them, but readded the rest. On what basis do you say those two critics are "irrelevant"? I strongly disagree. – Erakura (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at February 28 Incident, you may be blocked from editing. DrIdiot (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Talk:Andrew Gillum. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Pokémon: The First Movie, you may be blocked from editing. ''You have removed referenced material. Please discuss such changes on the article's talk page first. The source Coventry Telegraph is notable as evidenced by its article.'' Ifnord (talk) 01:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Citobun (talk) 02:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Citobun (talk) 03:51, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit Warring
You will be blocked from Wikipedia the next time you participate in edit warring on the page Kowloon EGL1234 (talk) 03:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fizz fam (talk) 05:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

New message from Fizz fam
Do you know what a sock puppet even is??? Fizz fam (talk) 05:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kowloon, you may be blocked from editing. You are back to making the same kind of edits that got you blocked in April -- if you persist, you will most likely be blocked for longer. – Erakura (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the message you left on my talk page: it is OK to have disagreements about references on Pokémon: The First Movie, but unilaterally making changes as you did back in April without discussion and leaving an edit summary like "the world doesn't cares what a few farmers living in little England thinks" is not going to get you very far on Wikipedia. So to respond directly: I disagree with your positions on those sources -- whether a journalist is alive or not has no bearing on the opinions they expressed at the time that movie was released. This is your one warning -- cut it out with this kind of disruptive editing. If you want to participate in the community and discuss your position amicably and without using the kind of language you've used in edit summaries, you are absolutely welcome to do so. Otherwise, continued editing along the lines you have thus far will likely lead to another block. – Erakura (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)