User talk:100.12.28.237

January 2020
Greetings! I'm 100.12.28.237. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit to Luxembourg has been undone because it is without merit. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 21:19, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Opencooper (talk) 00:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Apple Park‎. ''Stop making that edit. It was challenged and I agree with the undo. Per WP:BRD] it's up to you to take it to the article's talk page and attempt to get consensus for your change. And please don't throw terms such as "slander" around.'' Meters (talk) 02:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bruce Nuclear Generating Station have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bruce Nuclear Generating Station was changed by 100.12.28.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873625 on 2021-04-23T03:10:42+00:00

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bruce Nuclear Generating Station have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bruce Nuclear Generating Station was changed by 100.12.28.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851629 on 2021-05-09T06:05:23+00:00

Your recent editing history at Bruce Nuclear Generating Station ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You have made this edit eleven times now. I agree with the editor who said that his is a POV edit. Leave it alone.'' Meters (talk) 03:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Vasa (ship) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —&#8239;BarrelProof (talk) 04:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing Bruce Nuclear Generating Station for a period of 1 month for edit warring to restore disputed content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are able to get talk page consensus for your chosen wording before the one month block expires, I will unblock you. If you return to edit warring the disputed sentence in after the block expires, I will extend the block.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * As your disruption and edit warring continue to extend to other articles, the block has been extended and is now site wide.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to George Foreman Grill. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Ifnord (talk) 00:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bruce Nuclear Generating Station ‎. You are edit warring and evading a block on user:KB1338. Meters (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)