User talk:100.2.139.76

February 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to L'Oréal, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ev iolite  (talk)  21:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Cards   84664   05:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * OK that is fine. 100.2.139.76 (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Court Square–23rd Street station ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Epicgenius (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * You got it. 100.2.139.76 (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing.  Cards   84664   01:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia.  Cards   84664   04:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Wait why cant you just give me one chance. Can you unblock me im like addicted to editing. 100.2.139.76 (talk) 19:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 03:26, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2022
Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Poo-Pourri—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 02:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jennifer Meyer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Suonii180 (talk) 23:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jennifer Meyer. Thank you. Suonii180 (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Whoopi Goldberg, you may be blocked from editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 19:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Whoopi Goldberg. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 19:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Is this just for whoppi i was just adding a better photo. In high quality? 100.2.139.76 (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Editing is one of my favorite things to do on spare time. 100.2.139.76 (talk) 19:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Your editing
Is wp:disruptive. If someone reverts your edit, please discuss rather than repeating it. See wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. I suggest you read wp:introduction and learn how Wikipedia works especially the editing process. Please avoid making wp:test edits that break things. I highly recommend that you can use wp:show preview and carefully check that your edit works and all the citations (References) are working. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * 👍 100.2.139.76 (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 13:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * What?? i have been editing for 5 years, I did nothing wrong! i understand 4 weeks or a month but not 3 months, I believe this is super unfair and you should lower the block to a month, all i do is edit wikipedia! please jake not 3 months. 100.2.139.76 (talk) 00:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You can appeal the block using the unblock template and the instructions above. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 12:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to New York Islanders—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Andethyst  (talk)  14:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of bus routes in Nassau County, New York ‎. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Epicgenius (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

August 2022
Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Q37 (New York City bus)‎‎ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Epicgenius (talk) 02:47, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Q20 and Q44 buses, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''The Queens bus redesign has not been finalized yet, nor has a final plan been published. Please refrain from changing "Q20A" and "Q20B" to "Q20" until then. Thank you.'' Epicgenius (talk) 01:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at M60 (New York City bus), you may be blocked from editing. ''You are now changing articles so that they have factual errors. The M60 is not a limited-stop route and never has been. Please stop.'' Epicgenius (talk) 12:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I made a mistake on that the M60 is actually SBS. 100.2.139.76 (talk) 22:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC)