User talk:100.36.176.45

I felt this section was needlessly messy and unclear. I mostly just rearranged the wording to be clearer about context using proposed and removed past edits that, though worded poorly, rightfully attempted to add the context of the strict definition of matriarchy being used here to the claim that historical matriarchal societies do not exist, especially given context. In other words, I wanted to better match together the repeated references to the debate of prehistoric matriarchal societies with the context that such claims are strictly within the definition used, changing little of the actual facts presented and clarifying and remaining consistent with definitions earlier defined. I am concerned that the motivations of such edits that I saw were largely politically motivated, so I ask please to be careful of any further edits to maintain the clarification that "No historical matriarchy exists" is true, but only within the framework of a strict definition of matriarchy. Whatever your politics, I feel it is fair to make sure that use of those definitions is clear and precise so as to avoid making what is a factually true statement sound like a opinionated judgement.100.36.176.45 (talk) 01:59, 22 August 2021 (UTC)